Example collocations logo

Weapons in sentence

2993 examples of Weapons in a sentence

The ban treaty would prohibit so-called nuclear sharing arrangements, whereby allies of nuclear weapon states could store weapons on these states’ territory.
The two treaties can converge in a framework that minimizes nuclear threats in the near term; reduces the number of nuclear weapons in the medium term; and aspires to the complete, verifiable, and irreversible elimination of nuclear weapons in the long term.
Russia is literally buying its way back into the international system as a preeminent actor, one that is regaining power and clout by replacing nuclear weapons with oil and gas and substituting greed for fear.
Yes, Russia still punches above its weight in some areas, like nuclear weapons.
Obama clearly recognizes that the NPT needs to be strengthened in order to prevent countries from turning their civil nuclear-power capacity into weapons.
This is principally an issue for the US and Russia, which possess 95% of the world’s nuclear weapons.
The Maoists enter the government still with their own army – confined to cantonments, with their weapons stored under UN monitoring – and a Young Communist League that has persistently acted outside the law.
And some Syrian rebel forces seem more than willing to work with Turkey against the Kurds – and not just for the sake of obtaining more weapons and aid.
As the leader of the 13th Division, a Syrian rebel brigade that receives American weapons and participates in the larger Turkish operation, declared, rebel forces “will fight anyone who places obstacles before the revolution.”
But Obama viewed involvement in Syria as an all-or-nothing proposition: either the US deployed 200,000 troops to occupy the country for decades, or it would have to leave the fight to flawed local partners, perhaps wielding US-provided weapons.
And yet some in China equate South Korea’s THAAD deployment with North Korea’s weapons programs.
The North Korean regime, led by Kim Jong-un, is engaged in a remorseless quest to develop nuclear weapons and intercontinental missiles capable of delivering them.
Today, issues such as infectious diseases, environmental degradation, electronic crimes, weapons of mass destruction, and the impact of new technologies are of importance.
Last year, the Rand Corporation estimated that as many as 270,000 troops would be needed just to secure the North’s nuclear weapons.
Whether the Kim regime collapses with a bang or a whimper, the country’s nuclear weapons will present both an immediate danger and a future proliferation threat.
Ensuring that these weapons are not used, moved, or exported is a task that will require the capabilities of the US armed forces.
In this scenario, Russian-US cooperation in crisis situations like Afghanistan, or in countering the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, would become much more profound.
But that’s like saying that one country stands to lose more than another in an exchange of nuclear weapons.
In other words, Qatar is an important US ally, a supplier of weapons and funds to Islamists, and a peace broker all at the same time.
Both Qatar and Saudi Arabia generously supplied weapons and funds to Sunni extremists in Syria, opening the door for the emergence of the Islamic State.
The US accounted for more than one-third of global product and had an overwhelming preponderance in nuclear weapons.
For example, after American voters learned that President George W. Bush had led the United States into a war with Iraq without proof of weapons of mass destruction, they re-elected him.
Stopping the spread of nuclear weapons, promoting more efficient energy use, taking action on climate change, and maintaining an open global economy – these and other tasks require Chinese participation, even cooperation, if globalization is not to overwhelm us all.
To bet that these countries, having acquired such weapons, would behave responsibly would be a high-risk gamble.
Maduro recently announced that if the regime cannot muster the votes needed to stay in power, it will use its weapons instead.
If ideas are like weapons in lobbying, it is important to appreciate the possible distortions in the market for their creation and diffusion.
Levels and types of nuclear weapons were permitted and limited so as not to challenge the fundamental reality of mutual vulnerability.
A number of countries, including but not limited to North Korea, Iraq and Iran, are developing ballistic missiles and possibly nuclear weapons to go with them.
Speaking in Washington on May 23, Bush committed himself to a nuclear weapons arsenal reduced to "the lowest possible number consistent with our national security."
Critics contend that a missile defense system will prompt Russia to refuse to reduce nuclear weapons and China to build more.
BackNext