Weapons
in sentence
2993 examples of Weapons in a sentence
And it is very honest and responsible picture starting from small details of uniforms and
weapons
up to human relations, war routine and Central Asian landscapes.
It all starts in 1955 with a British spy disappearing while tracking a Russian cargo full of
weapons
in Suez.Then France sends his best friend, agent OSS-117, to discover what happened to both the shipment and the agent...
Great murder
weapons.
In her case, we can see the film as also feminist, in the position of women at that time, in which the only
weapons
Mme Chabert has are her charm, beauty, wiles and, ultimately, money.
This is one of my favorite James bond in games because: The missions are fun to play they have lots of action in them they can be hard that makes them fun to do the
weapons
you use are good.
It takes place in a crowded train station and the protagonists are ambushed by assassins with automatic
weapons.
The structure of the movie fits that description: a brief history of man as beast, until we become truly man by mastering
weapons
and acquiring reason, then a long sequence about man (the rope, as it were), and then a brief glimpse of the overman.
Sure, there were lots of
weapons
at the Branch Davidian compound.
Procuring so many period
weapons
in such good shape is testament to the attention to detail and presentation this film should be noted for.
Ten years later Kersey seems to have learned unarmed combat and how to handle anti tank
weapons
in his spare time .
think that it was a way better if lydie denier knew karate also or if she knew to use some weapons,her character has become more interesting too and she was a decent opponent to cynthia.i
This movie pops right out of the pages onto the screen with sheer violence, blood, martial arts, weapons, fire, the good against evil, etc. Yeah sure a lot of action flicks contain all these goodies, and most of them have bombed.
The weapons, uniforms, and hearing it German while reading the subtitles gave it much credit for a good military movie.
Those
weapons
are nothing to him his real finisher is ripping out eyeballs from the victims sockets.
On a routine mission in Iraq a group of Delta soldiers recover a computer hard drive from an Alqueda training camp detailing the location of
weapons
specialist Dr Walsh.
After witnessing the termination of his top secret
weapons
development program Dr Walsh finds an alternative funding source and sets up a new research facility deep in the notorious Belzan forest in Chechnya where he is developing
weapons
and selling them to Chechnyan rebels.The team of Deltas is sent on a black ops mission to retrieve the doctor and his technology before the Russians find him and his lab.What the Delta team soon discover is that the doctors latest
weapons
is a flock of large carnivorous bats that have been genetically altered to develop a taste for human flesh.
The fight scenes are all with sword or different
weapons
and very entertaining to watch.
Why lie about not firing
weapons
when it can be clearly shown on video?
Maybe it's the gadgets and
weapons.
If you wanna have kids trained on
weapons
or the best way to kill a neighbor, go ahead, impose them Lethal Weapon, Kill Bill, any manga's anime, tell them Santa's a depraved who enters through the chimney directly to violate them.
When you go at an open air cinema under the Greek summer night you usually don't care what the movie is! Edison started really good with some good effort from the singers-who-want-to-be actors and a once again great Morgan Freeman but... (In a movie there is usually a good start to catch audience,done, a bit boring yet story filling middle of the movie that is more about characters and less about action ,done, and the third part is something really good so that you can remember the movie...) when you see 30 elite police officers (packed with
weapons
that can demolish a building) shoot at a guy behind a car, fail to hit him even once while he kills all (but 3) and then the guy takes out a flame thrower (to kill the rest 3) ,you realise that the Greek summer sky filled with stars is way too good to be distracted by a movie like this!
There is nothing wrong with the idea, modern day Japanese troops get pulled back in time to the days of Busido warriors and with their modern
weapons
are a match for almost everything.
I spotted
weapons
that might have been used by Crusaders in "Kingdom of Heaven," and one character was even wielding a Windlass Steelcrafts reproduction movie sword from "Beowulf & Grendel"!
Also, all the 20 somethings some how know how to use automatic
weapons
and hit a target without even aiming the gun.
In 2005,George W. Bush started with his second period as a President of the United States; North Korea announced its possession of nuclear weapons; Pope John Paul II died after a long illness; and a movie called Into the Blue appeared.The existence of this movie is not as bad as the other things that happened on that year,but the film itself was pathetic and maybe,the worst one from that year.Now,in 2009,the United States have another President,there is another Pope,new Korean nuclear weapons...and the film Into the Blue 2 : The Reef,which is better than the original one...but that's the same as saying : "getting your fingers cut is better than getting your head cut".This sequel is a really bad film which kept me tremendously bored and uninterested.The cast of Into the Blue 2 : The Reef is composed by TV-series actors who completely lack of any credibility and dramatic weight,but who are perfect for showing their bodies.Chris Carmack (The O.C.),David Anders (Heroes and Alias),Laura Vandervoort (Smallville),Marsha Tomason (Lost) and Audrina Patridge (The Hills) bring hollow and boring performances.I have liked some previous movies from director Stephen Herek (Critters and Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure specially) but on this movie,he cannot generate even the minimum level of tension,emotion or entertainment.The characters from this movie are not only badly performed,but they are also repulsive.Honestly,I wanted all of them to die.The cinematography from this movie is also lame and it seems to have been made by a technical team who makes promotional videos for Hawaiian hotels.Into the Blue 2 : The Reef is a horrible movie which is better than the original film,but that's the same as nothing,as I previously said.Avoid this crappy film at all costs.
Are we really to believe that a Scottish arms dealer openly selling
weapons
of torture to oppressive regimes could manage to evade media scrutiny but fall foul of a couple of school-kids?
Someone steals a high-tech stealth fighter, planning to use it to fire chemical
weapons
(which we later, bizarrely discover, will destroy the whole world in 48 hrs).
The original is riveting, from the location filming to the use of the actual participants,
weapons
and victims belongings.
Other than updated graphics, modern day themes (such as terrorists), modern
weapons
and a sexy new voice for Ripley unfortunately this is the same sad tired story.
Whilst at sea a violent storm swallows their precious gold intended to buy the
weapons
and almost takes their lives.
Back
Next
Related words
Nuclear
Their
Would
Which
Destruction
Chemical
Could
World
Military
There
Other
Against
About
International
Countries
States
Program
Should
Country
After