Unconvincing
in sentence
160 examples of Unconvincing in a sentence
Furthermore, I found Chris and Leonora's relationship somewhat
unconvincing.
The bipolarity of the ruthless thug (one minute a ruthless killer, the next minute a Luv's diaper commercial) is completely
unconvincing.
Cates is insipid and unconvincing, Kline over-acts as always, as does Lithgow while butchering an English accent (at least, I assume that's what he's attempting), and the tone staggers uneasily between farcical and maudlin.
Marc Singer, "Angel Blade",'02, played a very
unconvincing
weird guy and over acted in many scenes with a bad temper that looked comical.
But a good hour into the proceedings, I realized the dull casting is all the casting agent could dredge up, the
unconvincing
character studies are the result of writers' brain-fart, and the story is amorphous and plagued by unsubtle references to the woes of capitalism, materialism, and getting ahead in the postmodern world.
Although I suspect there's nothing in this movie to spoil for a willing viewer, the plot is simply an excuse for male-to-female and male-to-male couplings set in the
unconvincing
context of a competition between a Parisian school for future CEOs and a major school for those seeking higher degrees in the liberal arts.
The sets in this film, in addition, are fairly nonexistent, and the denouement is abrupt and
unconvincing.
Nicole Eggert didn't look the part, didn't act the part, and was totally
unconvincing
as a mountain guide.
Another flaw which is the film's biggest mistake is a lack of action, as we are asked to watch the story unfold but aside from Massey's nudity and maybe some unintentional amusements due to laughably
unconvincing
acting, there really is nothing of interest.
Patricia Arquette was out of her depth in such a role, and her acting was wooden and
unconvincing.
Attractive but
unconvincing
leads - these 20-somethings are supposed to be in high school?
The bad guys were
unconvincing
and carried as much menace as a dead sheep.
Virtually everything about this movie is amateurish and
unconvincing
- with one very notable exception: the performance of Clive Owen, who is like a Rolls Royce purring through a slum.
An appalling, insulting mess of a movie that plods and plods and plods along to an idiotic and
unconvincing
ending.
The same comment applies to a really odd and
unconvincing
camping trip.
The storyline was dull and
unconvincing
as were the characters, and I was disappointed that some of the characters in the original were not in this sequel.
Rather it is the
unconvincing
female performances and rather tedious script that the film so obviously relied on a little too much.
this is the very worst horror, if you can call it horror, you will ever watch, esp from one of the masters of horror Wes Craven, Poor Direction, Poor Acting, Poor Set, Poor Atmosphere makes this the biggest pile of rubbish ever! the bad guy is totally unconvincing, you couldn't even feel sorry for the guy! the gore, and horror involved in the film is laughable, it's just plain rubbish! the only good points i can think of is, It stars Natasha Gregson Wagner, Giovanni Ribisi, and Lance Henriksen, but not even that cast, could stop this from spiralling out of control, and into one of the worst horrors ever.
The acting was stale and unconvincing, the dialogue was silly and predictable, and the story was confusing and stupid.
Walter Pidgeon is a truly
unconvincing
hero and even moreso when he tries to go "undercover" as a villain who, we're meant to believe, drinks too much and knocks his wife about a bit.
The actors playing the kids look way too old for their roles and the flashbacks to the 1970s are totally
unconvincing.
Omar Epps is totally
unconvincing
as the hard man of the bunch, as is Ribisi, who's attempt at being the funny guy gets lost along the way.
George Murdock, is terrible as the main villain, and very
unconvincing.
Most of the characters are terrible stereotypes and truly
unconvincing.
The most disturbing scene in the entire movie is perhaps when Speck stomps one of the eight unfortunate nurses to death in her own bathtub, yet even this is merely implied, and not shown, save for a few
unconvincing
downward thrusts of Mr. Speck's leg.
Extremely slow movie.There are fine performances from all actors which is why above 5 score.Surya and Jyo are supposed to be this ideal husband and wife and we are shown this till it gets to a point you start asking is there a story.Then one day Jyo discovers Surya's diary to find his failed college love story .The college love story is totally
unconvincing
as Surya is an arrogant Senior who is always picking on Bhoomika, beats up her friend, yells at her in public and despite being terrified of him she falls in love for him.Even after that he continues to dominate her using crude language.I certainly could not appreciate the meek character played by Bhoomika, I don't think any self respecting woman will fall for such jerks in real life.So Jyo decides to bring them together and what happens after that is the climax.
Well...there were some great, creamy-smooth facial shots of Marlene, along with her "shocking", gender-bender outfit (plus her not-to-be-missed "transmogrification" from ape into human being); but, overall, the generally
unconvincing
plot and dated acting -- not to mention the less than engaging tunes coming from Miss Dietrich's "baritone" voice --did little to ensure Blonde Venus a permanent place in my mind's Pantheon of Memorable Films.
The plot is implausible and
unconvincing
and, after a terrific start, it seems to run out of steam.
Secondly, the moderate gore is ridiculously fake and unconvincing, with the definite highlight occurring when this annoying uptight ultra-conservative woman gets electrocuted by a toaster.
The characters are perfectly drawn, and in the wrong hands because of their depth, they could have been
unconvincing
- but all the actors are simply astounding.
Next
Related words
Characters
Totally
Acting
Movie
There
Their
About
Story
Scenes
Completely
Between
Scene
Nothing
Which
Makes
Little
Could
Actors
Wooden
Seems