Example collocations logo

Transfer in sentence

1032 examples of Transfer in a sentence

Abe spoke repeatedly in the Australian Parliament earlier this month of Japan’s new “special relationship” with Australia – terminology normally associated only with the strongest of alliance partnerships – and followed his address by signing an agreement for the transfer of defense equipment and technology.
For starters, they must take action to protect the rural environment, ensure animal welfare, and improve education, knowledge transfer, and business training for farmers and agricultural workers.
In the meantime, both sides risk disrupting transfer payments (including to the elderly) and the provision of public services, as well as eroding further America’s global credit standing.
More progressive tax and transfer policies will also be needed, in order to ensure that the income and wealth gains from automation are more equitably shared.
These decisions, along with increased life expectancy and escalating health-care costs, drove a massive increase in transfer payments over time, regardless of which party was in power.
As a new global platform for renewables, IRENA will provide policy advice and assist in capacity building and technology transfer.
The history of European integration suggests that regional cooperation, give and take, the pursuit of shared goals, and even in some areas the transfer of sovereignty are the best ways to overcome tensions and promote peaceful problem-solving.
What about the transfer of power to a new generation?
But the real problem is that the global economy is badly overleveraged, and there is no quick escape without a scheme to transfer wealth from creditors to debtors, either through defaults, financial repression, or inflation.
Of course, inflation is an unfair and arbitrary transfer of income from savers to debtors.
But, at the end of the day, such a transfer is the most direct approach to faster recovery.
That is clearly disingenuous, and the announcement of large US tariffs on Chinese exports is intended to encourage China to comply with the WTO rule on technology transfer.
Although the US does not have such a requirement, it would be helpful for both countries to state openly that in the future no foreign company will be required to enter a joint venture or to transfer technology in other ways as a condition of doing business.
Most, indeed, implicitly assume a massive transfer of almost all functions of government from member states to the federal center, and thus the creation of a “European superstate.”
These resources, €600-700 billion, would replace and not add to national budgets, since they would accompany the transfer of some governmental functions.
But when some of these functions are assigned to a federal level of government, one has the additional tool of being able to transfer resources to pay for these tasks.
Under WTO rules, they are free to seek technology transfer from their foreign partners on a commercial and voluntary basis.
The argument that US firms have been compelled to transfer their technology to China thus lacks significance.
And, even if regarded as true, such claims would not definitively prove that forcing foreign enterprises to transfer their technology is prevalent in China.
These countries are heavily dependent on their oil revenue to support their governments’ spending – especially massive transfer programs.
President Vladimir Putin would no longer be able to maintain the transfer programs that currently sustain his popular support.
Governments nowadays are essentially running gigantic redistribution machines that steer funds from taxpayers to transfer recipients and other beneficiaries of public expenditure.
Income can be measured in two ways: market income before taxes and transfer payments, and disposable income after taxes and transfer payments.
Surprisingly, inequality of market income before taxes and transfer payments in the US is similar to that in many other developed countries, including those with egalitarian reputations like Sweden and Norway.
Among developed countries, the US does have the most unequal distribution of disposable income after taxes and transfer payments.
But, among developed countries, the US has the least generous and progressive transfer system.
The US spends a much smaller share of GDP on family-assistance programs – including cash transfers, tax breaks, and direct government services – than its developed-country counterparts, where reliance on regressive consumption taxes to fund progressive transfer programs has kept income inequality significantly lower.
Indeed, according to a recent study, the decline in tax and transfer progressivity accounts for about 30% of the growth in post-tax-and-transfer income inequality in the US during this period.
The US needs a more progressive and redistributive tax and transfer system to combat rising inequality in market incomes.
King Abdullah’s reform efforts – especially those aimed at curbing the power of the ultra-conservative Wahhabi-Salafi religious establishment – have lost steam, and the deaths of two crown princes have complicated the inter-generational transfer of power.
BackNext