Example collocations logo

Trading in sentence

1439 examples of Trading in a sentence

As one of the world’s largest trading countries, it is virtually impossible for China to keep a tight lid on capital outflows when the incentives to leave become large enough.
We should toast the likely successes: some form of financial-product safety commission will be established; more derivative trading will move to exchanges and clearing houses from the shadows of the murky “bespoke” market; and some of the worst mortgage practices will be restricted.
Now that Trump has set a match to the global trading system, one wonders if America’s plutocrats and their congressional lapdogs will soon realize that a bungling government chained to the unpredictable whim of a labile president is not, in fact, ideal for sustaining and creating wealth.
Trading in derivatives by investment banks, hedge funds, and other market participants, reaps huge profits for traders while depriving the real economy of productive investment and job creation.
The ASEAN economies adopted a united front on international economic issues and accorded priority to internal economic integration and expanding linkages with major trading partners.
But such revisions of Basel II are not enough, because bank portfolios – especially those of international banks with large trading books – are vulnerable to the risks stemming from long-swing fluctuations in asset markets.
Their aim is to discourage trading that pushes prices further away from the range and to encourage trading that helps to bring them back.
But many free-market economists are inherently suspicious of direct support for specific investments, instead harking after the pure and simple market solution – a carbon price set either by taxation or by competition for permits within an emissions trading scheme.
One hundred years ago, our trading was limited to the supply of raw materials, mainly gold, timber and cocoa.
One hundred years later, our trading consists of raw materials, mainly gold, timber and cocoa.
A commission headed by Sir John Vickers, the Oxford economist and former Bank of England chief economist, wants banks’ retail operations to be “ring-fenced” from riskier trading and investment banking businesses.
If it did not contribute much to the crisis, keeping risky trading away from commercial banks’ deposit base may still be desirable, but not something that the financial crisis “proved” is necessary.
Some commercial-banking activities are closer to securities trading.
The so-called “Volcker Rule,” proposed by Paul Volcker, the former US Federal Reserve chairman, is a mini-Glass-Steagall, aiming to bar deposit-taking commercial banks from derivatives trading – now seen to be a dangerous activity for them.
But, again, although derivatives trading played an important role in the crisis (AIG’s inability, without a government bailout, to honor its risky credit-default swaps is the best example), Glass-Steagall’s repeal did not unleash the riskiest trades in the institutions that failed.
And, if the problem is systemically risky derivatives trading in banks and elsewhere, then the priority given to derivatives traders over nearly every creditor ought to be curtailed.
No big bank was at risk from trading securities then, but the big banks’ investment-banking affiliates were not making money trading and underwriting securities during the Depression, so the banks were willing to surrender that part of their business.
The rule-based trading system developed by the GATT and the WTO has been embraced by virtually the entire global community.
The latter requires member states to provide the same treatment to trading partners within national borders as that provided to nationals.
In fact, what we have seen in recent years is an increasing rush to bilateral agreements by the major trading countries and blocs.
This independent body has been a resounding success, giving the world an effective quasi-judicial system to resolve disputes between trading partners.
Furthermore, the EU’s non-discriminatory tariffs are fully applicable to only nine trading partners.
Second, key trading countries must shoulder more responsibility for the global trading system.
And, third, trading partners must reach a common understanding that they will avoid emulating the US’s revanchist trade measures, lest they cause a global cascade.
Eventually, a worldwide carbon trading system could generate much of the money needed to finance a global conservation network.
Fostering policies that encourage an economy to squander its saving and live beyond its means makes trade deficits a given – as are the seemingly unfair trading practices that may come with this Faustian bargain for foreign capital.
Just over three years ago, oil (WTI) was trading above $100 per barrel.
China is now Latin America’s second-largest trading partner and rapidly closing the gap with the US.
How Imports Boost EmploymentMEXICO CITY – According to today’s populists, “good jobs” in US manufacturing have been “lost” to competition from imports and preferential trading arrangements.
For example, if the US decides to curtail imports, many of its trading partners will reduce their imports, too, because they will no longer be able to finance them.
BackNext