Trade
in sentence
11085 examples of Trade in a sentence
But this could prove to be a hollow solution, given that the UK maintains a
trade
surplus with the US, and Trump is a vocal critic of American
trade
deficits.
The vast majority of the UK’s
trade
is with the EU, not with the US; and this, like the UK’s geographical location and security environment, is not going to change.
He promised to “make America great again” by isolating it from all negative influences, limiting trade, and supporting “American-made” products.
We cannot develop a vigorous European economy, create European jobs and grow a European future while continually accommodating an increasing
trade
imbalance.
So long as populism lingers as a political threat, the risk of reactionary protectionist
trade
policies and higher capital controls will remain heightened, and this could derail economic growth.
At the heart of China’s measures are improved public transportation, green trade, and a revision of the energy mix.
In a wider context this could lead to a strengthening of the so-called Northern Dimension of the EU, where the goal is a free
trade
area to include all the countries around the Baltic Sea.
While a nation has a clear interest in the benefits of free and open trade, it also has a vital interest in its citizens’ safety.
In this age of terrorism, doctrines like free
trade
must be re-defined to include the public’s interest in “goods” like safety as well as more conventional goods like televisions and autos.
The slave trade, colonialism, and the flawed process of colonial divestment all left their mark on Africa’s newly independent and fragile states.
Finally, growing economic insecurity is creating a backlash against
trade
and globalization, which may significantly alter attitudes towards China.
And world leaders must be unambiguous about resisting protectionism and opening
trade
and investment.
In particular, we believe that an international agreement on
trade
facilitation is the right step, as it would reduce export and import costs and restore momentum to global
trade
liberalization.
The Making of China’s
Trade
DeficitBEIJING – China registered a monthly
trade
deficit of $7.2 billion in March 2010, its first since April 2004.
And yet, at around the same time, the United States Congress issued its loudest call ever to classify China as an exchange-rate manipulator, accusing Chinese leaders of maintaining the renminbi’s peg to the dollar in order to guarantee a permanent bilateral
trade
surplus.
China’s March
trade
deficit indicates, first of all, that it is incorrect to claim that Chinese economic growth depends mainly on exports.
The net value added of total Chinese foreign
trade
accounts for only about 15% of GDP.
Indeed, rapid growth in investment may translate into high import growth and
trade
deficits.
In that case, the
trade
deficit recorded in March could be at least 40% higher.
After all, its previous
trade
deficits in the era of reform – such as in 1992-1996 and 2003-2004 – all occurred at times of overheating.
The result is the March
trade
deficit, caused mainly by exceptionally high annual import growth (65%) coupled with relatively low export growth, which reached a nominally impressive 24% only because of the sharp decline recorded in the base period.
The problem currently is that a
trade
deficit has emerged at a time when the national saving rate is as high as 51%.
Churning this turmoil into frenzy is the illegal drug
trade.
Markets are the products of a very basic human characteristic, namely the characteristic to trade, to barter, or exchange goods and services.
Declining remittances from overseas workers, shrinking
trade
flows and investment could undermine new businesses, throw thousands out of work, and increase tensions and instability.
Trading in Trump’s LiesBERKELEY – In a recent Vox essay outlining my thinking about US President Donald Trump’s emerging
trade
policy, I pointed out that a “bad”
trade
deal such as the North American Free
Trade
Agreement is responsible for only a vanishingly small fraction of lost US manufacturing jobs over the past 30 years.
This is undoubtedly a significant problem; but anyone who claims that the collapse of US manufacturing employment resulted from “bad”
trade
deals is playing the fool.
Briefly, I argued that “bad”
trade
deals are irrelevant to the problem of diminishing economic opportunities, and I outlined how American
trade
– in fact, industrial – policy should address manufacturing.
I also tried to explain why certain cohorts, from both the left and the right, have long fixated on
trade.
In fact, as far back as 1993, I have been asking union leaders, members of Congress, and lobbyists who have opposed
trade
deals why they do not expend the same level of energy on other important issues – including many where common ground could easily be found.
Back
Next
Related words
Global
Countries
Would
Which
Economic
World
Their
Investment
International
Other
Growth
Could
Deficit
Policy
Should
Economy
About
Country
Between
While