Trade
in sentence
11085 examples of Trade in a sentence
Moreover, the currency depreciation in the wake of the Bank of Japan’s efforts to increase the annual inflation rate to 2% is expected to benefit exporters, though a substantial effect on the
trade
balance is yet to be seen, probably owing to higher import costs.
As a result, the
trade
surplus continued to fall, to $20.4 billion, fueling growing concern about a Chinese slowdown.
In fact, the Chinese economy’s true condition had long been obscured, but has now been exposed by more stringent regulation of activities such as speculative trading of the renminbi masquerading as
trade
payments.
In particular, China’s “two systems in one country” enabled exports to bonded warehouses in Hong Kong to be used to pad
trade
statistics.
For example,
trade
in Guangdong Province and Hong Kong in the first quarter of 2013 increased by 91.6% year on year.
So the EU’s continuing commitment to a philosophy of open trade, globalization, and carbon reduction could be sufficient to prevent a paradigm shift toward protectionism and climate-change denial that seemed almost inevitable with Trump’s election.
Creating a full EAU – one that is gradually less tied to the West by trade, financial, economic, payments, communications, and political links – may be a pipe dream.
OXFORD – Between escalating
trade
disputes and the divisions at the G7’s summit this month, the breakdown of global governance has become starkly apparent.
To be sure, despite the United Kingdom’s Brexit vote and America’s unilateral diplomacy and
trade
tariffs under President Donald Trump, the West has not abandoned the notion of shared values.
In assessing shared interests,
trade
is an obvious area of concern.
Trump’s
Trade
IllogicLONDON – With all the public attention in the United States focused on health care, immigration, and Russia, the Trump administration’s
trade
policies have flown largely under the radar.
But the underlying logic of President Donald Trump’s approach to
trade
is about to receive prime-time scrutiny, because the landmark North American Free
Trade
Agreement (NAFTA) will come up for renegotiation later this summer.
For starters, there is Trump’s false premise that bad
trade
deals have cost US jobs.
Automation and robotics led to the decline in manufacturing jobs in developed economies long before any major
trade
agreements were concluded.
The forces of globalization may have aggravated these trends, but the point so often lost in the debate – and dismissed by so many on all sides – is that
trade
agreements are meant to tame the forces of globalization, not accelerate them.
The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP)
trade
agreement, which Trump abandoned with such fanfare after taking office, spelled out a range of enforceable commitments intended to level the playing field for US workers.
Trump’s knee-jerk withdrawal from the deal eliminated opportunities to improve global labor conditions and make
trade
more fair for American workers.
US
trade
policy today is not the work of a single party or entity.
While different negotiating styles might have secured different results, it is hardly credible to suggest that the US has suffered a shortage of first-rate representatives in
trade
talks.
But Trump’s claim is consistent with his intense focus on “deals,” as if
trade
negotiations were a one-off transaction for the next luxury property or package of distressed debt.
They’re not: If
trade
negotiators don’t like their Chinese counterparts’ tone, they can’t simply go looking for a more reasonable or more eager partner who can open up China’s markets for US farmers.
Ross’s warning sounds troubling, but it reveals a fundamental misunderstanding of modern
trade
policy.
If
trade
agreements in the twenty-first century are about setting rules that raise the standards of international commerce, it does little good to establish those rules one treaty at a time.
For most countries,
trade
with the US was the biggest prize, but the fact that the TPP granted access to 40% of the world economy gave the US more bargaining power, not less.
That will be the true price of Trump’s flawed
trade
logic.
These geographical barriers keep much of Africa, especially rural Africa, out of the mainstream of international
trade.
Without the benefits of trade, much of rural Africa struggles at subsistence levels.
With its systemic negative effects on finance, trade, and labor mobility, Brexit marks a major setback for globalization.
The UK’s trade, finance, and immigration arrangements are far too complex and entrenched to be renegotiated quickly.
The latter part of the nineteenth century, despite its technological limitations, was an era of rising global
trade.
Back
Next
Related words
Global
Countries
Would
Which
Economic
World
Their
Investment
International
Other
Growth
Could
Deficit
Policy
Should
Economy
About
Country
Between
While