Trade
in sentence
11085 examples of Trade in a sentence
His threats to launch a
trade
war against “unfair” foreign competition seems likely to draw in Russia’s steel exports.
But the European Union’s restrictions on financing and
trade
are unlikely to last much longer in any case, especially now that the United Kingdom’s hawkish views will no longer shape that conversation.
But now that he is taking action to reduce America’s bilateral
trade
deficit with China, there could be grave consequences for the world economy.
With a decisive turn towards open
trade
and market liberalization in 1991, India finally broke free of the shackles of a failed economic strategy.
For example, despite nationalist rhetoric by state enterprises and associated
trade
unions, the government should decide that the vast telecommunications network should be privatized, including to foreign investors.
He also hopes to sign and implement the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, which China initiated several years ago to counter the now-defunct Trans-Pacific Partnership, next year (an overly ambitious target unlikely to be achieved, owing to the complexities of multi-party
trade
deals).
The most prominent feature is
trade.
As the largest trading partner of numerous Asian countries, China will offer attractive
trade
terms to its neighbors, much as it has done with Singapore.
But neither sweet talk nor
trade
deals will secure reliable allies for China, especially in a contest against the US.
But CPI targeting instead tells the central bank to tighten policy in response to an increase in the world price of imported commodities – exactly the opposite of accommodating the adverse shift in the terms of
trade.
Emerging countries in Latin America, East Asia, Eastern Europe, and Africa are innocent bystanders in the tussle between the US and China over currencies and
trade
imbalances.
And an unwillingness to
trade
away export-led growth is having the same effect on the East’s surplus countries (especially China).
On a regional level, Rudd argues, the US and China could work on joint strategies to denuclearize and, ultimately, reunify the Korean Peninsula; tackle the lingering sore of Japan’s war history; harmonize regional
trade
agreements; and transform the East Asia Summit into a more complete Asia-Pacific Community.
With just 10-15 years of estimated oil reserves remaining, the United Arab Emirates last year dropped visa requirements for most Westerners in an effort to accelerate the development of a viable tourist
trade.
For the rule governing global
trade
rounds is that nothing is deliverable until everything is agreed.
Indeed, all previous
trade
rounds – even the Uruguay Round, which took eight years to complete – concluded favorably.
During the last 20 years, the world has witnessed dramatic proliferation of regional and bilateral preferential
trade
agreements.
Indeed, bilateral
trade
flows covered by such agreements now amount to roughly half of the world’s imports, and have contributed significantly to the dramatic growth of
trade.
There is a big difference between multilateral negotiations of universal rules and the effective imposition of rules – and even concessions – in a negotiation between the EU or the US and a smaller
trade
partner.
The gradual marginalization of the WTO would also erode its credibility in fulfilling its key role as adjudicator of
trade
disputes.
The SCO promotes free trade, too, and aims to build essential infrastructure such as roads and railways to link its members and boost commerce between them while also harmonizing customs systems and tariffs.
Given China’s importance in both military and economic matters, growing energy and
trade
relations between Central Asia and the West, and the reasonable assumption that Central Asia’s security will continue to have great significance for Western security, cooperation between the SCO, the EU, and NATO looks inevitable.
His administration’s
trade
policy is based on serious misconceptions.
Trump and his advisers seem to believe that only balanced bilateral
trade
is fair and, therefore, desirable.
In fact, such balance is very difficult to achieve in an open trading system, and pursuing it would actually be damaging, as it would undermine the overall benefits gained through
trade.
Modern systems use money, because, as a store of value, it serves as a kind of buffer, removing the need for a perfect balance between supply and demand, and enabling all actors to get what they need from
trade.
Instead, America’s NAFTA partners will respond strategically to limits on their exports, adjusting their
trade
relationships with each other and with others, in order to mitigate the impact of US import controls.
Protectionist behavior by the US could even trigger a
trade
war, as occurred after the introduction of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff in 1930, in which case everyone would lose.
To develop a more effective
trade
policy, the Trump administration must acknowledge what current-account balances are and are not.
The first is that there is no mechanism linking world
trade
rules to exchange-rate movements.
Back
Next
Related words
Global
Countries
Would
Which
Economic
World
Their
Investment
International
Other
Growth
Could
Deficit
Policy
Should
Economy
About
Country
Between
While