Trade
in sentence
11085 examples of Trade in a sentence
What’s more, “free
trade
is good for the environment,” to quote one academic study.
At the same time, free
trade
has been shown to create more jobs for women, reduce employment discrimination, and improve human-rights conditions.
Of course, not everyone benefits from freer
trade.
One recent study suggests that free
trade
increases income inequality, and the cost of redistribution could erode upwards of 20% of the gains.
This indicates we should be willing to spend perhaps 20% of
trade
benefits on helping the losers from
trade
deals, through job training and transitional social-welfare benefits to ameliorate the risks.
Europe currently accounts for more than 50% of Russia’s
trade
turnover.
Given Trump’s belief that international negotiations are just a forum for making unilateral demands, how could Mnuchin – who, like his boss, lacks government experience – persuade other countries that adherence to common rules and norms, such as open trade, is in everyone’s interest?
China no longer qualifies as a currency manipulator under any of the three internationally accepted criteria: exchange rate,
trade
balance, or foreign-exchange reserves.
After China’s
trade
surplus peaked at 9% of GDP in 2007, it adjusted to the receding price competitiveness: it has been less than half that level each year since 2010.
True, Germany’s
trade
surplus is 8% of GDP, and its current-account surplus is close to 9% of GDP, which is excessive.
Moreover, successful monetary stimulus would raise income through domestic channels, thereby boosting imports, so the net effect on the
trade
balance could go either way.
Trading up Global
Trade
TalksIn the year since the breakdown of the
trade
talks in Cancun, sentiment has increasingly grown in the developing world that no agreement is better than a bad agreement.
Our first message was that the current round of
trade
negotiations, especially as it has evolved, does not deserve even to be called a Development Round.
Well before the riots that marked the World
Trade
Organization talks in Seattle in 1999, I called for a true "development round" of
trade
talks to redress the inequities of previous rounds.
Indeed, in the last round of
trade
negotiations, the Uruguay Round, the world's poorest region, sub-Saharan Africa, was actually made worse off.
We analyzed which reforms in the international
trade
regime would most benefit those in the developing world, and we presented an alternative agenda based on our findings.
These were off the agenda in earlier
trade
rounds, as the US pushed for liberalization of financial services - thus serving its own comparative advantage.
The
trade
talks in Cancun raised new subjects - the so-called Singapore issues.
As tariff barriers have come down, the unfair "fair
trade"
laws are increasingly being used as America's favored protectionist tool.
The round of
trade
negotiations begun in Doha in November 2001 was launched in a different spirit.
It aspired to promote
trade
as a vehicle of partnership between developed and developing countries.
As the economist Jagdish Bhagwati pointed out 16 years ago in his article “The Capital Myth,” there are fundamental differences between
trade
in widgets and
trade
in dollars.
The case for liberalizing
trade
in goods and services is strong; the case for complete capital-account liberalization is not.
Capital controls are invariably porous, and we cannot gain the benefits of free
trade
and FDI without creating some opportunities for short-term investor positioning.
Combined with higher
trade
among them, the future of emerging economies is one of reduced dependence on industrial-country demand, though not a complete decoupling.
The hiccups in Western banks have served to disrupt the availability of
trade
credits, and, if amplified, could destabilize local banks.
Moreover, the transfer and diffusion of technology has been facilitated greatly over the last few decades by increased foreign direct investment, the information revolution, which has facilitated access to knowledge, increased trade, and the globalization of financial markets.
Many other factors, of course, influence growth and convergence: macroeconomic stability, the efficiency and robustness of the financial sector, the terms of trade, the quality of public administration, demographic factors, and political factors.
Europe must understand that Georgia does not need humanitarian aid, but
trade.
High Tariffs on Chinese Imports Would Weaken AmericaBEIJING – Until the 1970s, the United States’ foreign
trade
was largely balanced.
Back
Next
Related words
Global
Countries
Would
Which
Economic
World
Their
Investment
International
Other
Growth
Could
Deficit
Policy
Should
Economy
About
Country
Between
While