Example collocations logo

Thrills in sentence

190 examples of Thrills in a sentence

It dose not have the depth of "Vertigo" (1958) nor the brooding atmosphere of "Rebbeca" (1940) and it certainly dose not have the emotional impact and acting talent that can be found in "Notorious" (1946), but what it dose have is thrills, adventure and a nail biting climax.
As the story progresses it turns out to be a mad chase from Ram Gopal Bajaj's wealth, full of humor, romance thrills and chills.
The flick is just a beginning, a provocative start leading to a larger discussion but it gets to work in my opinion, giving the right thrills and causing the audience to reason and to ask itself questions.
This is one of the best horror / suspense films that Hollywood has made in years or maybe even decades.Even though in my opinion this movie was predictable in parts, it has everything that a good film in this genre should had CHILL, THRILLS, AND yes a lot of GORE!! HOUSE OF WAX SURE DELIVERS!!!
Where bigger budgeted movies fail, "Terminal Choice" delivers lots of thrills, shocks and bloody violence.
Those elements are usually used to cover the lack of thrills in a film.
From then on her sweet and lovely ingenues were cast aside and she sizzled in parts that cast her as sophisticated women of the world or society girls out for thrills.
It's still enjoyable second and third times round but I found myself appreciating the humour more as the shocks and thrills weren't unexpected.
this true story telling at it's best... not Hollywoods usual cheap thrills and skin deep glitz.
It packs so many thrills and its so funny.
To the guy who hatched the idea for Lifeforce I have one thing to say: Thank you, sir! Lifeforce combines the big-budget sci-fi pomp of Star Trek: The Motion Picture with the cheap horror thrills of Phantasm and tops it all off with t-ts-- and some real meaty hangers at that..And best of all, it's actually a good movie!
It is a horror movie, which despite not being void of gore scenes relies more on psychology and masterful building of the tension in order to create thrills.
"Island of the Fishmen" delivers thrills and adventure from start to finish with surprisingly convincing special effects and astonishingly stylish camera-work.
I do recommend it being an intense drama with no lack of action and thrills.
I'm guessing it does and the result is a "thriller" with thrills that are thoroughly bad and yet comedic.
Anyway, "The First Power" (a.k.a "Pentagram") isn't a completely terrible effort, but the script overly reverts to clichés and lacks genuine thrills.
It's worse offense is that it has taken an interesting topic and reduced it to a ridiculous and BORING thriller that has no thrills and no suspense and no inner or emotional logic.Especially after the first half hour the movie dovetails into a series of ridiculous set pieces that are so over the top that the audience I saw it with was laughing at it.
The trailer is totally misleading - it is not suspenseful and there are no thrills - in fact the movie's truly worst offense is that it is simply boring.
The thrills are fairly good and some of it is surprising.
No tension or thrills for me, and the final monster was disappointingly cheesy and unscary.
Of course the camera work is fluid throughout, constantly on the move and incorporating hand-camera shots a-plenty, but director Lee fails to deliver thrills or suspense, falling down fundamentally by not making anything of the key protagonists in the film.
Still, the first time around, there were enough thrills to make up for it's periodic lulls, resulting in an uneven but overall fairly entertaining effort.
There was the potential for a lot of good scares (or thrills if you like) but none happened.
Stanley Kramer directs an action thriller and leaves out two key things: action and thrills.
Scary subject matter exploited for cheapjack thrills in the "Death Wish" vein.
Don't watch this film for carnal thrills - there are none and what there is is tragic.
The acting is lame, the comedy is pathetic and the script is no more than a loosely strung chain of clichés and cheap thrills.
If you want a movie with a few thrills in it, don't rent this one.
Definitely not a Hollywood blockbuster, but for cheap thrills it is not that bad.
The film, which in some way deals with the effect of boredom and the quest for thrills, actually delivers none, and seems like an exercise in boredom.
BackNext