Terrorism
in sentence
1692 examples of Terrorism in a sentence
American liberals and conservatives, as well as US friends and allies, all favor the principle of enhancing the security of dangerous nuclear materials and reducing the risk of nuclear terrorism, which could plausibly threaten anyone.
Terrorism
may spread to Germany, and refugees may move across borders.
And, unlike the first such declaration, made at the 2009 Summit of the Americas, this one was followed by concrete action, with Obama removing Cuba from the US list of states that sponsor
terrorism.
But nothing would have a greater impact than Turkey deciding that it will no longer allow itself to be a conduit, and that it will enforce United Nations Security Council Resolution 2178, which calls for stronger international cooperation against
terrorism.
This is a man who, according to his first wife, long kept a collection of Hitler’s speeches on his bedside table, and who blithely calls blacks “lazy,” derides Mexicans as “rapists,” and judges Muslims collectively guilty for Islamist
terrorism.
The fight against
terrorism
is also at stake.
Who has not yet realized that the Russian army is actually behaving like a group of pyromaniac firefighters, fanning the fires of
terrorism
through its behavior?
How much longer can we ignore the fact that, in raising the bogeyman of “Chechen terrorism,” the Russian government is suppressing the liberties gained when the Soviet empire collapsed?
The establishment of “national security” and “fighting terrorism” as stalking horses for intimidation of journalists who are doing their jobs – exposing government abuses to the light of day – gives the state an even more effective tool to suppress investigative reporting.
For the sake of global stability, economic efficiency and also the fight against
terrorism
we must instill greater democracy within our international organizations.
But Japan urgently needs such a debate if it is to respond to a world exposed to the threat of
terrorism
and gripped by fear.
Unfortunately, academic research into the psychological effects of
terrorism
suggests that extremist organizations such as al-Qaeda and the Islamic State are on to something when they launch attacks before elections.
In addition to causing death and destruction,
terrorism
can have a significant psychological impact on voters and electoral outcomes.
But
terrorism
has a unique power to divert voters’ attention away from “normal” politics, including economic challenges.
In “Fear in the Voting Booth: The 2004 Presidential Election,” a study published in Political Behavior in 2007, researchers from Duke University and Michigan State University cited surveys in which 42% of US respondents deemed
terrorism
to be the most important issue in the election.
The reason, Van Biezen argues, is that the PP-led government seemed to discount the role of Islamic
terrorism
in the attacks, and instead pinned the blame on the Basque separatist organization ETA.
Social-science researchers have also studied the effects of
terrorism
at a local level, in scenarios where one part of a country feels more threatened than others.
The impact that the mere threat of
terrorism
has on voters may also explain why some conflicts endure.
But, just as in the 2014 election, Republican-leaning voters in 2016 were far more concerned about terrorism, crime, illegal immigration, and economic security than they were about issues such as sexism, racism, and inequality.
Indeed, over the last 60 years, Tibetans have pursued a model resistance movement, untainted by any links with
terrorism.
Witness the connections in the war on
terrorism
between military actions on the top board, where the US removed a tyrant in Iraq, but simultaneously increased the ability of Al Qaeda to gain new recruits on the bottom transnational board.
Moreover, contemporary problems – for example, thwarting the spread of materials and weapons of mass destruction, maintaining an open world economy, slowing climate change, and combating
terrorism
– cannot be managed, much less solved, by any single country.
But did the Cold War's end merely make the world a more dangerous place - one of terrorism, insecurity, uncertainty, and growing disparities of wealth?
We need a new world order that benefits all, a global civil society that will help fight
terrorism.
We know that bombs and special operations alone won't make us safer, for we must fight the poverty that breeds
terrorism.
Just as my countrymen had remained strong in the face of terrorism, they held firm against the siren song of venomous populism.
Abe recognizes the new challenges posed by proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and terrorism, and has acknowledged the rising expectation, at home and abroad, that Japan’s contribution to international security must grow.
Leaders of these groups often defended
terrorism
by insisting that violence was the only means of bringing hope to demoralized people.
We in the EU believe that it is our common interest with the US to prevent radicalization and recruitment to
terrorism
throughout the world.
The EU will take up the Obama administration’s invitation to share its views with his Detention Policy Task Force on international law principles relevant to the fight against
terrorism.
Back
Next
Related words
Against
International
Which
Global
Fight
Security
Nuclear
World
About
Threat
Other
Their
Change
There
Would
Military
Countries
Climate
Political
Should