Example collocations logo

Terrorism in sentence

1692 examples of Terrorism in a sentence

We need Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and the Maghreb countries as partners in the fight against Islamist terrorism, and that means improved operational cooperation between security authorities.
The failures of economic development in the Andes, Central Asia, and Africa contribute to global instability, local insurrections and violence, drug trafficking, and bases for terrorism.
How is the EU to survive the loss of a major member state at a time when it already must deal with ascendant populists, economic malaise, a refugee crisis, and terrorism?
MELBOURNE – With daily headlines focusing on war, terrorism, and the abuses of repressive governments, and religious leaders frequently bemoaning declining standards of public and private behavior, it is easy to get the impression that we are witnessing a moral collapse.
The sheer nihilistic irrationality of terrorism strains and tests our own beliefs like nothing else can.
The terrorism threat ten years from now probably will be even more diverse and unpredictable.
This is especially ironic because African countries like Ethiopia stand steadfastly and bravely with the US in the fight for freedom and against terrorism, even as they struggle with hunger, disease, and famine.
The Cardoso government adopted an "economic terrorism" strategy to help Serra.
This includes US forces in Japan, which will focus on responding to North Korean nuclear and ballistic-missile threats, as well as new threats posed by international terrorism and China’s military build-up.
Peace is also a living issue today, given global terrorism and Europe’s unbreakable alliance with the United States.
Instead, after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, momentum swung toward a “global war on terror” that, in practice, became the rationale for maintaining a Cold War mentality and supporting strategies of preemptive war and regime change that have intensified insecurity, instability, and international terrorism.
With regard to international terrorism, Iran, as a victim of terrorism, condemns it in all its forms.
The country has not defined a coherent approach towards those who are resorting to terrorism to advance their agendas, both within Pakistan and abroad.
Domestic terrorism in Pakistan has taken a heavy human and economic toll.
By declaring war on terrorism, President Bush gained the domestic mandate he lacked.
Macron has another objective with regard to Trump: to prevent disagreements from undermining their ability to pursue shared interests, especially in the fight against terrorism.
9/11 remains the date that has come to signify modern terrorism in all of its terrible capacity to cause death and destruction.
In the meantime, however, we require a policy to deal with the terrorism that confronts us.
The first thing to do is to drop the metaphor of a “war on terrorism.”
To the contrary, terrorism is now part of the fabric of contemporary life.
The aim must be to create an environment in which terrorism is seen as neither acceptable nor necessary.
Terrorism must be stripped of its legitimacy; those carrying it out must be shamed.
But terrorism also needs to be stripped of its motivation.
Such a counter-terrorism policy will not eliminate the scourge of terrorism any more than modern medicine can eliminate disease.
The Peshawar massacre was not the first time that the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism became a terror victim.
Such is the generals’ Janus-faced approach to terrorism that six years after the Mumbai attacks, Pakistan has yet to try the seven Pakistani perpetrators in its custody.
The government’s commitment to the fight against terrorism has already caused FARC’s membership to plummet, from more than 20,000 a decade ago to little more than 8,000 today.
But this irrevocable commitment to defeat terrorism does not preclude us from also prudently pursuing a solution to the conflict through dialogue – while avoiding mistakes made in an earlier round of talks, during which a prolonged cease-fire allowed the FARC to regain some strength.
Gilani unequivocally declared in his inaugural address that fighting terrorism is a top priority, and his first decision was to release from house arrest judges deposed by Musharraf.
The new government should quickly devise a policy to deal with terrorism.
BackNext