Example collocations logo

Terrorism in sentence

1692 examples of Terrorism in a sentence

The G-8 nations and the global alliance that America leads must aim not merely to defeat terrorism.
And when did a disproportionate military response to terrorism ever work?
Those responsible for the atrocities in Istanbul may have calculated that Islamic terrorism will increase that uneasiness further.
Moreover, because Turkey borders on such countries as Iran, Iraq and Syria, it will bring to the EU a disturbing neighborhood: a part of the world incapable of developing a regional order on its own, a cockpit of Islamic radicalism and terrorism, a collection of fragile states imbued with nationalism, a field of competition for arms, even nuclear arms, a region where the US will remain strategically involved and where Israel will continue to provide a rallying point for anti-Western sentiments.
The West needs Russian cooperation in dealing with issues like nuclear proliferation in Iran and North Korea, the control of nuclear materials and weapons, combating the current wave of radical Islamist terrorism, and energy production and security.
It will allay the growing tensions between Christianity and Islam fueled by international terrorism and knee-jerk nationalism.
Unlike the “war on terrorism,” European integration can serve as a model for resolving the underlying crises of the Middle East and addressing the roots of violence in the wider region.
For most Scots, however, the Irish experience is not an appealing model – perhaps because it is associated with terrorism.
But his remark inadvertently underscored Turkey’s new reality, in which any perceived opponent of the current regime can be jailed, with or without evidence, for terrorism or other violent acts.
Special courts, tasked with prosecuting terrorism and crimes against the state, have been working overtime to produce charges that are often as absurd as they are baseless.
These options include developing counter-networks to meet networked security threats such as terrorism and proliferation of nuclear, chemical, or biological materials, as well as highly decentralized threats such as piracy.
There are, of course, specific, identifiable dangers, but what worries us most about terrorism, for example, is its unpredictable nature.
In the interest of promoting Sino-American cooperation against terrorism the Chinese government has toned down the emotional content of its anti-American rhetoric.
(Other democracies, such as the United Kingdom and Spain, always try terrorism suspects, including alleged Al Qaida members, in ordinary criminal trials).
There is no simple formula for regulating public space or safeguarding peaceful political dissent in an age of terrorism and globalization.
The only real option for tackling the refugee crisis is to address the causes of people’s displacement, including terrorism, hunger, disease, oppression, inadequate infrastructure, scarce vital resources, a lack of jobs and economic prospects, and falling standards of living.
There is a long-standing gap between terrorism experts’ perception of the probability of a nuclear event and the probability as perceived by the public.
To be sure, more incidents of global terrorism associated with Pakistan, such as July’s London bombings, will bring new pressures.
King Salman embraced Trump’s war against terrorism and anti-Iran rhetoric, and expressed support for an Israeli-Palestinian peace.
The situation is the same with respect to global growth, energy, resource management, climate change, environment, nuclear proliferation, arms control, and terrorism.
To some degree, fear of terrorism might shield US leaders from the need for accountability.
But eight in ten Americans think that terrorist attacks are unlikely, and many voters believe that involvement in Afghanistan and Iraq will increase rather than limit America’s vulnerability to terrorism.
One can hold forth on the theme of the “lone wolf” who falls into terrorism the way others fall into bed.
Indeed, his terrorism was perceived as a prelude to it.
In response to the recent mass shooting at an LGBT nightclub in Orlando, Trump boasted that he had been right all along about the threat posed by “radical Islamic terrorism.”
George W. Bush has bequeathed an unenviable legacy: an economic crisis, two wars, a struggle against terrorism, and problems across the Middle East and elsewhere.
The third priority will be what Bush misleadingly called a “global war on terrorism.”
It is equally difficult – if not impossible – for countries to isolate themselves from terrorism, weapons, pandemic disease, or climate change.
One additional step the US could take would be to label Pakistan as a state sponsor of terrorism.
And US policymakers must act soon, or an increasingly fragile Pakistan could well be transformed from a state sponsor of terrorism into a state sponsored by terrorists.
BackNext