Terrorism
in sentence
1692 examples of Terrorism in a sentence
Tusk will have to achieve something similar in the face of the new challenges confronting Europe today, which include Russian aggression in Ukraine, the rise of
terrorism
in the Middle East, and a stagnant economy at home.
Of course, crime, terrorism, conflict, and political instability severe enough to cause a total breakdown of law and order significantly impede creativity and innovation.
When
terrorism
indicators are taken into account, Lebanon, Turkey, Jordan, and Israel emerge as resilient innovators.
Beyond the enormous human suffering and loss of life, the most immediate byproduct of the region’s turmoil is the potential for more severe and frequent
terrorism
– both in the Middle East and emanating from it.
Moreover, in the 1980’s, Qaddafi invaded Chad and became a major sponsor of international terrorism, effectively ruling out any prospect of attracting the foreign investment needed to maintain competitiveness.
It is – to quote US President Barack Obama’s description of what motivated a married couple of Pakistani origin to carry out the recent mass shooting in San Bernardino, California – a “perverted interpretation of Islam,” and the ideological mother of jihadist
terrorism.
Saudi Arabia has been bankrolling Islamist
terrorism
since the oil-price boom of the 1970s dramatically boosted the country’s wealth.
A devoted foe of Islamist
terrorism
does not promote violent jihadism.
This speaks to the main shortcoming of today’s militarized approach to fighting
terrorism.
America’s Dangerous Anti-Iran PosturingNEW YORK – In recent weeks, US President Donald Trump and his advisers have joined Saudi Arabia in accusing Iran of being the epicenter of Middle East
terrorism.
But the caricature of Iran as “the tip of the spear” of global terrorism, in Saudi King Salman’s words, is not only wrongheaded, but also extremely dangerous, because it could lead to yet another Middle East war.
Governance failures, ranging from corruption to inefficient implementation of reforms, also pose a serious challenge, as do social and political tensions (and, in some areas, the threat of terrorism).
Fear of
terrorism
was widespread, and experts expressed concern about the future of democracy.
In other words, the US will have to use its soft power to create networks and institutions that will allow it to cooperate with China, India, Japan, Europe, and others to deal with transnational problems – for example, monetary stability, climate change, terrorism, and cyber-crime – that no country can solve unilaterally.
The test of whether multilateral cooperation can be put back on track, and reconciled with America's war against
terrorism
and the spread of weapons of mass destruction, may come with Iraq's reconstruction.
The only way to address the threat of
terrorism
effectively is to tackle the radical Islamist ideology that underpins it.
Burqa bans and other measures by European authorities that target Islam as such are superficial and counter-productive, as they create divisions in European society, while leaving the ideological underpinnings of
terrorism
unaddressed.
The risk is that when the American withdrawal from Afghanistan begins – a process that has just been brought forward to next year, from 2014 – the US will again seek to impose sanctions on Pakistan, an unreliable nuclear state that will react by strengthening ties with China and deploying Islamist
terrorism.
And, as the Mumbai terror attacks of November 2008 demonstrated, India today faces the threat of cross-border
terrorism
to which the Mahatma’s only answer – a fast in protest – would have left its perpetrators unmoved.
It will be a tragedy – especially for the Palestinians – if they promote or condone
terrorism.
Second,
terrorism
is undermining GDP growth and weighing down overall economic performance in affected countries; the economy of northern Nigeria, for example, has been devastated by the ongoing violence.
Third, the fight against
terrorism
is sucking up scarce financial resources.
Fifth,
terrorism
is undermining state building.
Finally, the risk that fighting
terrorism
poses to civil liberties is especially acute in Africa, where institution building is still an ongoing process.
But
terrorism
risks undermining the continent’s hard-won stability and strong GDP growth.
In addition to interstate conflict and the proliferation of weapons – particularly weapons of mass destruction – new challenges have emerged, such as
terrorism
and the involvement of non-state actors in internal conflicts.
Here would be a strange war of all against all, war with no clear-cut fronts; war difficult to distinguish from terrorism, genocide, and organized crime; war into which the whole world would be dragged by a myriad of indirect and hidden means.
There are now proposals for a shared eurozone budget and finance minister, and for an EU-level security union to tackle
terrorism
and strengthen border controls.
Only when such a belief becomes general will despair stop fueling terrorism, and suicide bombing come to be viewed as an obscene calling.
Increasingly, the challenges Germany is facing have become intertwined; terrorism, the Syrian civil war, Russian aggression, and refugee flows are interacting in dangerous and unpredictable ways.
Back
Next
Related words
Against
International
Which
Global
Fight
Security
Nuclear
World
About
Threat
Other
Their
Change
There
Would
Military
Countries
Climate
Political
Should