Terrorism
in sentence
1692 examples of Terrorism in a sentence
The pressure on African governments to enact legislation against
terrorism
may pose new threats to civil liberties at the very moment when democratization is gathering momentum.
One solution is for the African states to evolve a common position and shared rules of engagement in the war on
terrorism.
Ideally, the US should deal with a South Atlantic Treaty Organization, consisting of African states that are allied against terrorism, rather than cutting bilateral deals with individual African countries.
Above all, if Africa is to escape the crossfire of international terrorism, the trend towards establishing US military bases on the continent must be stopped.
Although America and the West may have felt as if jihadist
terrorism
was declining in its ferocity, in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and India, no such feeling of false security ever took hold.
According to Brian Fishman, a
terrorism
expert at the US Military Academy at West Point, the growth in suicide attacks poses a severe challenge to Pakistan, for a “whole milieu of militant groups, and individuals have come together ideologically…to embark on mission(s) that Al Qaeda set(s) for them.”Bruce Riedel, the Afghanistan-Pakistan policy coordinator on Obama’s National Security Council, stresses that Al Qaeda's growing cooperation with the Afghan Taliban, the Pakistani Taliban, Lashkar-e-Taiba, and other like-minded groups is the most dangerous development in the effort to reduce global
terrorism.
For example, the current struggle against transnational
terrorism
is a struggle over winning hearts and minds, and over-reliance on hard power alone is not the path to success.
Bush was also able to partly change the tone of the US message in the hemisphere: from free trade and fighting terrorism, to combating poverty and strengthening democracy and human rights.
Aside from the explosive situation in the Middle East and the threat of Islamist terrorism, the West is now confronted with the rise of Asia, the return of a more assertive Russia, and new energy and environmental challenges.
Not only has the term become a shorthand way to malign an entire industry; autocrats are invoking it as an excuse to jail reporters and justify censorship, often on trumped-up charges of supporting
terrorism.
This followed the Egyptian government’s praise for the Trump administration in February 2017, when the country’s foreign ministry criticized Western journalists for their coverage of global
terrorism.
Vaguely worded laws that conflate reporting about
terrorism
with supporting it provide cover for regimes intent on preventing unfavorable news coverage.
We ended the war in Iraq; we are implementing an effective transition and drawdown in Afghanistan; and we have seriously weakened Al Qaeda’s leadership in the fight against
terrorism.
At the same time, increasing military spending, challenges to maritime security, non-traditional threats ranging from piracy to terrorism, and the destruction wrought by natural disasters are making the region’s security environment more complex.
Fighting
Terrorism
DemocraticallyBombings in London and Turkey have brought to the fore the old ideas that authoritarian regimes are better equipped than democracies to combat terrorism, and that such attacks are the price we pay for liberty.
The mistake, however, is to assume that open societies are more permissive and vulnerable to
terrorism
than those who live under authoritarian regimes.
But such a guarantee is a mirage anyway, whereas respect for basic freedoms and due process when repressing
terrorism
is a powerful instrument to isolate extremists and diminish their legitimacy in the eyes of those that might identify with their cause.
Indeed, recall the
terrorism
in Beslan in September 2004, in which a single attack on a school killed over 330 people.
Iraq also is demonstrating the limits of illegitimate violence when combating
terrorism.
When it comes to fighting terrorism, moreover, democracies are more effective both politically and operationally, particularly in terms of their intelligence services.
At the same time, the rule-of-law approach to fighting
terrorism
must be a pillar of European cooperation with third countries, namely with those of the Mediterranean, or with Pakistan, thereby contributing to a security culture that is conducive to democratization.
The response to
terrorism
should be to reaffirm the value of the rule of law over arbitrary repression, and of the diversity that is the hallmark of Europe’s cities, particularly London and Paris, but increasingly many others across the Union.
The combination of poverty, drought, famine, and HIV/AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa threatens more human lives than
terrorism
or tsunamis ever did.
Re-Thinking Counter-TerrorismGrim-faced border guards and tough security measures at international airports provide powerful reassurance that the developed world is spending hundreds of billions of dollars to protect against
terrorism.
Although citizens of rich countries regard
terrorism
as one of the world’s greatest threats, trans-national terrorists take, on average, just 420 lives each year.
Recently, the Copenhagen Consensus, whose purpose is to weigh the costs and benefits of different solutions to the world’s biggest problems, commissioned new research into the merits of different methods of combating
terrorism.
There is no panacea for
terrorism.
Israel’s occupation of Arab lands in that war, and its subsequent deployment of military forces amidst the Arab population of the West Bank and close to the powerful military machines of Egypt in the south and Syria in the north, exposed it to Palestinian
terrorism
from the east.
The “Rational” Suicide BomberHamas’s surprise victory in the Palestinian parliamentary election has made the question of who is a terrorist, and how
terrorism
should be tackled, more urgent than ever.
While
terrorism
is rightly viewed as an illegitimate means, nationalism is a rational, and often legitimate, goal, and it is shared by many people who are not terrorists.
Back
Next
Related words
Against
International
Which
Global
Fight
Security
Nuclear
World
About
Threat
Other
Their
Change
There
Would
Military
Countries
Climate
Political
Should