Example collocations logo

Terrorism in sentence

1692 examples of Terrorism in a sentence

My government will not allow Pakistan’s schools – so vital to our country’s future – to become targets of terrorism.
For example, during his recent visit to Saudi Arabia, Trump identified India as a victim of terrorism – a problem that the US shares.
Instead of supporting those who fight international terrorism, many Europeans try to blame the spread of terrorism on Israel and the US.
For roughly four years, he represented the best that the West and India could hope for in a Pakistani leader – someone with military authority, who seemed convinced that his own survival, and the interests of his state, demanded a clampdown on terrorism.
Re-Thinking Homegrown TerrorismBERLIN – Homegrown terrorism stands high on the security agenda almost everywhere in Europe.
The narrow aim should be to nip terrorism in the bud, and the broader aim should be to open a dialogue with the Muslim community.
The study provided valuable insights into homegrown terrorism, for it revealed a consistently close link between radicalization and “vicarious” experiences of marginalization and discrimination.
And, while individuals who had Islamist sympathies and condoned violence were more likely than others to become involved in homegrown terrorism, a mere 1.1% of Germany’s Muslims fell into this category.
This is in marked contrast to the conventional view in the West that the prime motive for Islamist terrorism is religious.
But, as protagonists in the complex web of interaction between the Muslim and the Western worlds, they view militant terrorism as their preferred option.
There are, of course, other forms of interaction, and this brings us back to the question of how to respond to homegrown terrorism.
A distinction is often made between “hard” tools for combating terrorism – i.e. executive, including military measures – and “soft” tools such as programs promoting the integration of Muslim immigrants, efforts to stabilize and develop problem countries, and strategies for intercultural dialogue.
In the first month of the war on terrorism, some Islamic political parties were drawn into anti-American protests and even Vice President Hamzah Haz (chairman of one of Indonesia's strongest Islamic parties) was tempted to ride this tiger for a time.
Second, there is a widespread belief that advanced economies’ urban elites – in government, the media, and business – are either uninterested or unable to address their societies’ most serious problems: economic inequality, banking crises, aging populations and overburdened social-security systems, terrorism, porous borders, rapidly changing community identities, and much else.
The same is true of a long list of items: the spread of infectious diseases, the stability of global financial markets, the international trade system, the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, narcotics trafficking, international crime syndicates and transnational terrorism.
For some time, senior military officials have been concentrating on rooting out terrorism at home, and they have scored some impressive successes.
The second difficulty concerns the fact that Sharon has always appeared to believe that it is within the means of the Palestinian Authority to eradicate all terrorism arising from Palestinian territories and aimed at Israel.
The creation of such hope now depends exclusively on Israel, which must act immediately to boost the many Palestinians who yearn for peace, rather than insisting on a total disappearance of terrorism.
These include proliferation of weapons of mass destruction around Russia's borders; international terrorism and drug trafficking which benefit from social and economic dislocations, especially across the Greater Middle East; and the challenge of Islamic militancy.
Those realities call for continuous UN action on countless fronts: combating malaria and AIDS, reducing maternal and child mortality, fighting global terrorism, and ensuring nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation.
Brunson is but one of many thousands accused of terrorism in the post-2016 crackdown.
By destabilizing the region, the war enabled the rise of the Islamic State, which at its height occupied a substantial slice of Iraqi territory, beheading its opponents, attempting genocide against the Yazidi minority, and spreading terrorism around the world.
After North Korea threatened to restart its nuclear facility at Yongbyon, the Bush administration in early October removed the country from its terrorism blacklist.
And, in a world where borders are becoming increasingly porous to everything from drugs to infectious diseases to terrorism, America must mobilize international coalitions to address shared threats and challenges.
Cyber war and cyber espionage are largely associated with states, while cyber crime and cyber terrorism are mostly associated with non-state actors.
The highest costs currently stem from espionage and crime; but, over the next decade or so, cyber war and cyber terrorism may become greater threats than they are today.
Trying to limit all intrusions would be impossible, but one could start with cyber crime and cyber terrorism involving non-state parties.
Another aspect of America’s domestic practice of liberal democracy that is currently being debated is how the US deals with the threat of terrorism.
But the problem of how to deal with terrorism is not just a matter of history.
The EU's foreign policy should be guided by the following goals:fight terrorism;prevent local conflict;promote human rights and democracy;oblige unpredictable countries to become responsible;maintain close cooperation between Europe and the US;help poor countries.
BackNext