Example collocations logo

Technological in sentence

2092 examples of Technological in a sentence

Specifically, it may be that we have reached a turning point in the march of technological progress – one that we are navigating very badly.
It is only natural for such a long process to include moments when technological change generates unprecedented challenges.
As Xi pointed out in his WEF speech, it “is a natural outcome of scientific and technological progress, not something created by any individuals or any countries.”
There is no denying that the technological turning point at which we find ourselves has caused strain for all countries.
But instead of blaming one another for the challenges generated by technological progress – an approach that will only bring about the worst of times – we should work together to address them.
What this means is that we have largely failed to convert growing technological unemployment into increased voluntary leisure.
Donald Rumsfeld’s dogma of military “transformation” – the technological upgrading of an army’s capacity to enable decisive victory with fewer troops – failed resoundingly in Iraq.
Nor could Israel, with its overwhelming technological advantage, defeat Hezbollah in Lebanon.
The insurgents in Iraq, as the British admit, were able in just three years to cope with their enemies’ technological superiority in a way that the IRA in Northern Ireland was unable to do in 30 years.
Russia had a highly educated labor force, with advanced technological capabilities;Iraq is a developing country.
These are just the latest indicators that China is at the center of a global energy transformation, which is being driven by technological change and the falling cost of renewables.
And its investments in renewables at home and abroad can lead to additional technological breakthroughs that drive down costs for consumers everywhere.
Despite these hurdles, technological innovation should help Chinese producers realize productivity gains and deliver savings to consumers.
Indeed, most established parties are so busy playing defense that they have little inclination to engage in the type of forward-looking strategic thinking that is needed to re-energize exhausted growth models, anchor financial stability, and ensure that technological innovation enables broad-based prosperity.
To some extent, technological innovation will pick up the slack, as it empowers individuals and companies to live more self-directed lives, creating pockets of excellence and wellbeing.
They point to rapid technological progress, which has boosted output from new and old capital investments.
Money brings technological regeneration as well as security.
More recently, technological advances have become an increasingly important driver of structural transformation, with information technology and job automation reducing wage rates for low-skill jobs and further eroding the political and market power of organized labor.
Of course, technological advances, like hydraulic fracturing (“fracking”) in the shale-gas industry, could increase supply and therefore lower prices.
The intervening years have seen an explosion of technological innovation that has carried America’s general productivity growth back up to its pre-slowdown levels.
Social Security’s actuaries may not have fully recognized the impact of today’s technological revolutions, but they have markedly boosted the scale of the system that the US government can afford.
The current global revolution is based on rapid technological advances that have dramatically decreased the cost of creating, finding, and transmitting information.
While the information revolution could, in principle, reduce large states’ power and increase that of small states and non-state actors, politics and power are more complex than such technological determinism implies.
Achieving that goal requires neither a technological breakthrough nor a scientific discovery.
Technological change promises even faster trading speeds in the near future.
Meanwhile, technological and market forces have contributed to job polarization, with the middle-income bracket gradually deteriorating.
The Nobel laureate economist Robert Solow has shown that growth comes from three sources: the working population, capital investment, and technological progress.
On the other hand, economic growth below the sum of growth in the working population and the labor-saving part of technological change fuels unemployment.
Often, these limits are not binding, but, once capital deepening is exhausted, technological progress, which makes inputs more productive in creating final value, is the long-run driver of growth.
Japan has been the biggest provider of development assistance and technological know-how to ASEAN for the past four decades.
BackNext