Example collocations logo

Technological in sentence

2092 examples of Technological in a sentence

Yet the vast body of evidence suggests that technological changes were a much bigger driver in global wage patterns than trade.
So it is no surprise that banking and financial-services companies are not safe from the immense transformations wrought by technological innovation.
The region is also severely deficient in scientific and technological research.
The United States has experienced steady de-industrialization in recent decades, partly due to global competition and partly due to technological changes.
This agenda is all the more important because rising inequality can produce a backlash against globalization and technological change, both of which are major drivers of economic growth.
To prepare the world to confront the challenges posed by globalization and technological development in a way that supports sustainable and equitable growth, governance institutions and regulations at both the national and international levels must be drastically improved.
Worse, because the partial fixes to the financial system will enable even more globalization, they will end up making matters worse, as strain on already-inadequate governance and regulatory frameworks increases, not only in finance, but also in other economic and technological fields.
Meanwhile, enormous financial investments focused on securing a higher rate of return are likely to fuel technological innovation, further stressing regulatory systems in finance and beyond.
Major technological advances fueled by cheap money can cause markets to change so fast that policy and institutional change cannot keep up.
While America’s increasingly aggressive policies with respect to trade, investment, and technology transfer may slow this process, China will achieve its objectives by investing heavily in research and development, technological diffusion, and human capital.
The global order could come to be defined less by shared rules than by a balance of economic, technological, and military power.
Crucially, the US also wants to retain its technological and military superiority.
All advanced economies’ structures and portfolios of employment opportunities are facing similar competitive and technological forces, and all are tending to shift income toward the upper end of the distribution and toward owners of capital.
I hope that this year the Nobel committee will recognize the importance of theoretical work and give the prize in the correct proportions: to a single experimental physicist, for developing the technological concepts behind LIGO, and to two pure theoreticians: Trautman and Damour.
After all, with four times as many people as the US, and a determined program to catch up after centuries of technological stagnation, isn’t it inevitable that China will decisively take over the mantle of economic hegemon?
For example, it must devise a way to retain dynamic technological growth while preventing excessive concentration of wealth and power.
Europe has been unifying gradually for 50 years now, and we can reasonably look forward to further inter-continental cooperation and integration, not least because of scientific and technological developments.
At the same time, the financial imbalances and distortions that precede a crisis delay appropriate and necessary responses to technological and global market forces in the real economy as well.
But technological progress is putting into the hands of deviant groups and individuals destructive capabilities that were once limited primarily to governments and armies.
The first is technological change.
Fears about job losses arising from technological progress are not new.
Another caveat is that technological change may worsen the income distribution if the jobs that are destroyed are those filled by unskilled workers.
But globalization and technological progress, by making it easier to match supply and demand, will make such monopolistic behavior harder to maintain in the future.
Advocates of liberal market economies need to grasp that many reforms and technological advances may leave some groups – possibly large groups – worse off.
Some argue that, as long as the US maintains its economic dynamism, leadership in technological innovation, and attractiveness to immigrants, income inequality is irrelevant.
Lin argues that China can achieve 8% annual growth for another two decades, owing to its enduring “latecomer advantage,” which, among other things, entails rapid productivity gains brought about by technological catch-up with the United States.
Similarly, policies to promote continuous technological innovation and industrial upgrading can increase productivity.
Fifth, as a result of decades of catch-up growth, China is approaching the technological frontier in many areas and the latecomer’s advantage is diminishing, which means that the marginal productivity of its capital stock is diminishing, too.
Meanwhile, globalization and technological innovation have had profoundly negative effects on certain social cohorts, and public policies have failed to mitigate the damage.
A more pessimistic view has taken hold, in which the future is corrupted by globalization, untamed markets, labor-saving technological innovations, and global warming.
BackNext