Example collocations logo

Technological in sentence

2092 examples of Technological in a sentence

This is not just because they are much more expensive, but also because there are massive technological hurdles to overcome to make them efficient.
Excessive regulation of Japan's non-tradable sector has constrained GDP growth for years, while structural rigidities in Europe's economies impede adaptation to technological advances and global market forces.
Properly targeted public investment can do much to boost economic performance, generating aggregate demand quickly, fueling productivity growth by improving human capital, encouraging technological innovation, and spurring private-sector investment by increasing returns.
Given that roughly one-third of output in advanced economies is tradable – a share that will only increase, as technological advances enable more services to be traded – the benefits of a program to channel savings into public investment would spill over to other economies.
This deceleration was inevitable as China advanced from extreme poverty and technological backwardness to become a middle-income economy powered by external trade and consumer spending.
Unless China’s leaders upgrade the country’s growth strategy to stimulate technological progress and structural transformation, high-income status will continue to elude the world’s second-largest economy and most populous country.
From technological developments to geopolitical rivalries to policy shifts among major trading partners, the causes of the renminbi’s decline – and, thus, the factors influencing China’s exchange-rate policy – are varied and complex.
The reality is that technological advancement, combined with flexible and dynamic labor and capital markets, led to a rapid rise in productivity growth and the spread of new technologies.
While these trends have undoubtedly fueled the economic rise of some developing countries, the West – especially the US – retains a technological and innovative edge.
Indeed, America’s technological lead – together with its enormous capital assets and dynamic business culture, exemplified in Silicon Valley – could ultimately reinforce its global standing.
But, with major emerging economies like China and India working hard to foster innovation, while still benefiting from technological catch-up, it is also possible that continued globalization and digitization will propel continued “de-Westernization” of the international order.
In fact, even though the US remains dominant in military, political, economic, technological, and cultural terms, its global hegemony already seems to have slipped away.
Within the framework of techno-politics, economic growth and technological innovation are the two most important factors shaping the global landscape.
Perhaps most important, even as economic growth slows, technological change continues at a breakneck pace, raising seemingly unanswerable questions about its potential impact on the global economy.
While some warn that technological progress will leave many unemployed, others remain convinced that displaced workers will find new jobs that do not yet exist, as has occurred in the past.
Moreover, a major part of the socialist legacy in both countries is the cumulative effect of the state’s active role in technological development.
Canada has an opportunity not only to repair its international reputation, but also to highlight the significant technological and ecological advances made by innovative oil producers in recent years.
At the same time, the right carbon price would enable a smooth transition away from fossil fuels by encouraging investments in technological innovation.
The central driver of all this is today's enormous acceleration in the underlying pace of technological and economic change.
The Nobel laureate Robert Fogel argues that a new synergism between technological and physiological improvements has produced a radically new form of human evolution, which he calls technophysio evolution.
While most economists argue that Trump is mistaken to focus on the bilateral trade deficit, many support his complaints about China’s efforts to challenge America’s technological advantage.
But technological change has also spurred considerable dislocation, harming many along the way.
On the contrary, heterodox economists like Thorsten Veblen and Joseph Schumpeter long ago raised many of today’s cutting-edge issues in neoclassical economics, including the role of social norms and the relationship between technological innovation and business cycles.
One need not be a modern-day Luddite to acknowledge the potential productivity pitfalls of technological innovation.
The first might seem obvious: technological disruption is, well, disruptive.
Other technological innovations with major obvious drawbacks include opiate painkillers and increasingly advanced weaponry.
To be clear, I am not suggesting that the net effects of recent technological advances are negative.
The first, paradoxically, is the recent shift in US rhetoric away from a focus on American jobs to the explicitly Sinophobic objectives of “containing” China and preventing it from developing into a technological power that could challenge US global hegemony.
Of course, this 20% covers most of the policies that militant Sinophobes denounce, because they could enable China to challenge US technological and military hegemony by the second half of this century.
Nonetheless, the dangers implied by recent technological progress have become increasingly obvious.
BackNext