Example collocations logo

Taxes in sentence

2462 examples of Taxes in a sentence

Europe must reduce the deadweight of debt and taxes.
By reducing primary expenses, then reducing taxes.
Ireland, the European country with the highest rate of growth is also the one that most reduced its deficit and public debt by cutting expenditures and taxes.
Public infrastructure investments displace private investments and the taxes necessary to finance them introduce further distortions in demand.
Increases in income taxes imply that unions demand higher gross salaries in order to compensate for the fall in net salaries due to tax increases.
Therefore income taxes, in part, impact the cost of labor, contributing to high unemployment.
But unemployment is high because of taxes and excessive protection for those employed, which prevents the market from creating new employment opportunities.
One road is where the ECB digs in its heels on price stability and politicians forget about fiscal discipline and the fact that a market economy cannot work with half of GDP absorbed by taxes.
The other road reduces the fiscal burden of the social state, reinvigorating the economy by reducing taxes and providing the employed not with social protection but with more assurance of finding another job if they lose their current one.
Over time – but this could take years – consumers could invest in alternative energy sources and reduce demand for fossil fuels via carbon taxes and new technologies.
For much of the post-World War II period, until the 2000s, strong GDP and employment growth in the advanced economies meant that almost all households experienced rising incomes, both before and after taxes and transfers.
Sometimes initiatives have created ongoing challenges for elected leaders, as has been the case with California’s Proposition 13, which capped state property taxes when it passed in 1978.
And, though the issue raises obvious questions of justice and efficiency – poor countries, having invested large sums in education, now produce graduates who take jobs and pay taxes abroad – Europe has provided little in the way of an effective response.
Too many people are collecting benefits relative to those working and paying taxes.
In order to survive international tax competition – and thus be able to rely on corporate taxes as a source of revenue – Japan’s corporate-tax rate should be lowered in the long run.
The most comprehensive economic meta-study shows that total future climate impacts would justify a tax of around €0.01 per liter of petrol ($0.06 per gallon in the United States) – an amount dwarfed by the taxes already imposed by most European countries.
The Commission believes that over the next four decades, fossil-fuel costs will climb sharply, because sources will dry up and governments will place massive taxes on fossil fuels.
By the same token, the prediction that governments will impose massive carbon taxes has little basis in reality.
Breakthroughs do not result automatically from a combination of taxes on fossil fuels and subsidies for present-day green energy: despite the massive outlays associated with the Kyoto Protocol, participating countries’ investment in R&D as a percentage of GDP did not increase.
If, instead, the US faces a fiscal slope, then people who refuse to consider raising taxes – namely, Republicans in the US Congress’s House of Representatives – have a very weak hand indeed.
Or do they embrace a deal that cuts taxes and tax rates relative to where they would be otherwise?
Ireland’s projected budget for 2001 foresees a slight reduction in public expenditures, from 31% to 30.8% of GDP, and a simultaneous reduction of taxes by about .6% of GDP.
Of course, Ireland’s decision to cut taxes because of the huge surplus its robust economy has generated may have had electoral, rather than economic, motivations.
The Commission, for example, is particularly opposed to the Irish policy of reducing indirect taxes rather than social contributions, because the latter are supposedly more inflationary.
Under the Russian system, most taxes are centrally collected, so governors need good relations with federal authorities so as to maintain access to the ever-shrinking federal pie.
A short-term stimulus would not have bestowed the largest benefits upon the most affluent, whose spending is less sensitive to taxes.
Worse still, high levels of public debt, like high taxes, cause serious problems for economic performance.
The direct impact is obvious: a government that cannot borrow will have to cut spending or raise taxes, with contractionary consequences.
Between now and the midterms, they can brag about cutting taxes on most households.
Moreover, the final legislation will likely lower the federal deduction for mortgage interest and eliminate deductibility for state and local taxes.
BackNext