Strategic
in sentence
2937 examples of Strategic in a sentence
Re-Setting the NATO-Russia RelationshipWARSAW – Earlier this year, a group led by former US Secretary of State Madeleine Albright (which included me) issued a report on a new
strategic
concept called “NATO 2020.”
It further rightly suggests that NATO’s
strategic
political and military objectives could be achieved jointly with Russia through greater stability, mutual transparency, predictability, and arms reduction verified by non-proliferation and arms control agreements.
The WHO provided public-health authorities in the GMS with the technical and
strategic
guidance needed to make the dramatic, life-changing advances that we have seen in recent years.
Indeed, most established parties are so busy playing defense that they have little inclination to engage in the type of forward-looking
strategic
thinking that is needed to re-energize exhausted growth models, anchor financial stability, and ensure that technological innovation enables broad-based prosperity.
The country’s
strategic
importance has not been lost on China, which has, to the dismay of India and the United States, been working hard to strengthen its presence in the Indian Ocean.
In the emerging multipolar world, characterized by sovereignty concerns and
strategic
competition, progress toward resolving global issues will be more difficult than ever – with potentially devastating consequences.
Instead of exploiting Japan as a regional aircraft carrier, as the US tries to do, or neglecting her politically, as Europeans do, both need to work out a new,
strategic
approach – if possible, jointly.
If these two countries’ mutual hostility is not reined in, and a fundamentalist Afghanistan continues to provide the
strategic
depth through which Pakistan threatens its sworn Indian enemies, the current disaster might still breed defeat.
Obama is right to boast of his success in enlisting China to join serious sanctions on North Korea, but he might be wrong to draw conclusions from this about Iran, a vital
strategic
partner for the Chinese.
The West could (and should) have known better: Ever since his first term in office as Russian president, Putin’s
strategic
objective has been to rebuild Russia’s status as a global power.
Those who believe that the West can adapt to Russian behavior, as Putin’s Western apologists suggest, risk contributing to further
strategic
escalation, because a soft approach will merely embolden the Kremlin.
So a fundamental
strategic
struggle is now a given.
Europe will reduce its energy dependence on Russia, review its
strategic
alignment and priorities, and scale back investment and bilateral cooperation.
Europe’s
strategic
and normative interests have thus re-emerged with a vengeance; in fact, Putin has managed, almost singlehandedly, to invigorate NATO with a new sense of purpose.
Fully aware of what happened some four decades earlier when the US and UN forces expanded their
strategic
objective in Korea and tried to unify the peninsula by force, Bush resisted pressures to expand the war’s aims.
Beyond Asia, Israel is cozying up to Russia, purely on the basis of
strategic
considerations.
With the Asian giants, Israel lacks the shared global outlook that is essential for a true
strategic
alliance.
But NATO leaders will also lift their eyes from the immediate challenges of the day, and discuss a fundamental
strategic
question as well: how to use NATO to its fullest potential as a platform for holding political discussions and building transatlantic consensus across the wide range of the issues where Europe and North America share common interests and wish to defend common values.
In both cases, a seemingly low-cost opportunity was viewed as yielding a large
strategic
gain – at least in the short run.
The relationship between India and the US has evolved from one of cool distance to
strategic
proximity in a generation – lightning fast for geopolitics.
The US and India need not be formal allies for their relationship to have the desired effect on Chinese
strategic
calculations.
Just as Britain refused to concede naval supremacy to Germany a century ago, the US will not easily accept any Chinese challenge to its
strategic
position in the western Pacific, especially given that so many East Asian states are pleading for US protection.
Other member countries could exact concessions;Turkey, a long-standing NATO member of increasing
strategic
importance has made her consent for opening NATO dependent on herself being admitted to the EU.
And the central
strategic
project, European monetary union, remains in doubt.
It has also sought a leadership role on such
strategic
global issues as climate change and inter-faith dialogue.
Given this, it is imperative that ASEAN becomes pro-active and remains focused on relevant
strategic
issues.
I believe that Japan’s
strategic
role in the region will only increase, because its economy and industrial production chains have been regionally integrated.
But that remains a long-term
strategic
goal, not the stuff of presidential campaigns, especially when China seems too weak to pose any immediate threat to the US on any front in the foreseeable future.
Abe’s diplomatic overtures to Putin are integral to his broader strategy to position Japan as a counterweight to China, and to rebalance power in Asia, where Japan, Russia, China, and India form a
strategic
quadrangle.
To many of Myanmar’s leaders, their country is an economic-power-in-waiting.Home to some 53 million people, it is rich in minerals, natural gas, and fertile farmland, and it occupies a
strategic
location between India and China.
Back
Next
Related words
Which
Their
Economic
Would
Interests
Countries
Military
Political
Power
Global
Should
Security
About
Region
Other
Between
Country
Policy
World
Could