Strategic
in sentence
2937 examples of Strategic in a sentence
Asia’s Resource ScrambleNEW DELHI – Competition for
strategic
natural resources – including water, mineral ores, and fossil fuels – has always played a significant role in shaping the terms of the international economic and political order.
Furthermore, China’s fears that hostile naval forces could hold its economy hostage by interdicting its oil imports have prompted it to build a massive oil reserve, and to plan two
strategic
energy corridors in southern Asia.
Notably, in giving China control of its
strategic
Gwadar port in February, Pakistan has permitted the Chinese government to build a naval base there.
Given the significant role that natural resources have historically played in global
strategic
relations – including driving armed interventions and full-scale wars – increasingly murky resource geopolitics threatens to exacerbate existing tensions among Asian countries.
While
strategic
competition for resources will continue to shape Asia’s security dynamics, the associated risks can be moderated if Asia’s leaders establish norms and institutions aimed at building rule-based cooperation.
With the subtext in most cases being recurring nervousness about China’s rise, recent weeks have witnessed some very significant institutional and policy changes, as well as fundamental
strategic
repositioning, by the region’s major players.
Whatever the reasons behind it, the policy change will remove a major irritant from bilateral relations and facilitate much closer political and
strategic
cooperation in the Indian Ocean.
More wide-ranging and substantial than the usual bilateral bromides, Obama announced his “deliberate and
strategic
decision” to have the US play a “larger and longer-term role” in shaping the Asia-Pacific region as it draws down its forces in Afghanistan and the Middle East.
The discovery is the result of a
strategic
policy maintained through successive Brazilian administrations, something unusual in Latin America.
“Digital catching up,” as colleagues and I have noted, is a key
strategic
objective for many European countries.
But no pan-European statesman has emerged, and no major European institution has even had the courage to provide its own analysis of the current situation, much less propose a
strategic
scenario for the future.
With Afghanistan, Iraq, and Iran topping the list of
strategic
challenges facing the West, anchoring democracy and security in these new borderlands of the Euro-Atlantic community has become imperative for both the United States and the EU.
The TPP’s
strategic
value extends far beyond the economic benefits it promises.
This is why I support America’s
strategic
“rebalancing” to enhance peace and security in the Asia-Pacific region.
Japan is doing so by deepening its
strategic
relations with Australia and India, and we are enhancing our cooperation with the ASEAN countries and the Republic of Korea.
And now Japan will provide up to $2.8 billion dollars to help improve US bases on Guam, which will have even greater
strategic
significance in the future.
Unfortunately, a recently approved reform, despite being marketed as a
strategic
improvement, has only benefited a few, and far too little.
The emperor’s visit to Vietnam – the first by a Japanese monarch – represents an important milestone in the maturing bilateral relationship, which has been buttressed not only by strong cultural links, but also by robust economic ties and growing
strategic
cooperation.
Along with closer economic cooperation in recent years, Japan and Vietnam have been strengthening
strategic
ties.
The bilateral “strategic partnership” that was established in 2009 was upgraded to an “extended
strategic
partnership” in 2014.
From Vietnam’s perspective, Japan is perhaps the most important
strategic
partner with which to counterbalance China’s maritime expansionism and constrain its hegemonic ambitions.
Now that US President Donald Trump’s administration is threatening to reduce military engagement with Asia, the need for
strategic
cooperation among regional actors is becoming even more acute.
The path toward ever-deeper economic and
strategic
cooperation, shaped by convergent national interests, now seems clearer than ever.
Chinese
strategic
thinking about “political warfare” holds that an adversary’s political, social, and economic institutions – particularly the media – should be targeted before a shooting war ever begins.
The Kingdom Beyond OilRIYADH – Over the past few weeks, the government of Saudi Arabia has been engaged in an unprecedented
strategic
policy review that could have ramifications for every aspect of the country’s social and economic life.
To accomplish this however, the kingdom will have to dramatically reduce its unhealthy dependence on oil – a
strategic
goal that has been long discussed, but never implemented.
In the skies of Serbia and Kosovo, NATO warplanes attacked target after target, not to support the liberation of territory or in furtherance of a
strategic
bombing campaign, but rather to change Milosevic’s mind.
Negotiations in a
Strategic
TrapTEL AVIV – The Israeli-Palestinian peace process, stymied by irreconcilable differences between the parties, has always depended on the
strategic
regional context.
Israel’s conventional
strategic
wisdom was based on an equation of “Bushehr versus Yitzhar” – that is, a readiness to dismantle West Bank settlements if the Iranian centrifuges in Bushehr were dismantled.
Nor do the Arab revolutions counsel Israel’s
strategic
planners to take security risks.
Back
Next
Related words
Which
Their
Economic
Would
Interests
Countries
Military
Political
Power
Global
Should
Security
About
Region
Other
Between
Country
Policy
World
Could