Shock in sentence

1561 examples of Shock in a sentence

I was in shock.

There are some scenes in the film which are there to shock the viewer, but I don't think they enhanced the story at all.

To their shock, the very next day Tamara walks back into the classroom looking seductive and, uh, dressed to kill.

But talk's cheap, the end result is what counts, and what we have here is a mediocre movie with some sex thrown in for shock value to try and con you into wasting your time watching it.

Imagen my shock when I saw the Broad st. of Bitola in the opening scene of the film, when the bride is shoot from the sniper.And what was that inserting real footage of the news covering in the film?

I accept it though for its shock value, decades before Trainspotting and Pulp Fiction.

This flick is so poorly done that the parts that "should" shock and revolt you come across as laughable at best.

If you are looking for shock value, this movie will disappoint you.

He does however, make points occasionally, but often in order to get to them, one has to sit through some pretty mind numbing attempted shock humor.

The people who made "Bloody Birthday", however, do neither of those things; they simply rely on the shock value of the image of a kid with a gun (or a knife, or a noose, or an arrow) in his/her hand.

By the end of the movie, it seems that all the cards were exhausted so the script becomes almost inadvertently funny in its efforts to find new levels of "horror", to continue to "shock" an audience which is already numbed by the plethora of dumb soap-opera "revelations" already served up in big bunches.

She is recently split from her unfaithful husband (shock) and is helping out a friend by watching her beach-front cottage rental.

Here is how the movie starts, Women are the only humans on this planet due to the fact that in the not to distant future chemical warfare is A OK as long as it only targets soldiers (In case your wondering, Men) However the virus back fires (Big shock)and all the men on earth slowly die.

I am not quite sure if the director's purpose was to truly portray some sort of deep message to his audience, or if he just sought to shock the hell out of them with gore, sex and violence.

This film is a very bad example of uninspired storytelling, which tries to hide behind an "artfilm" facade, trying to shock the audience with unmotivated violence (against women) to cover up for it's lack of psychological depth of the characters & internal conflicts.

But as it stands, it's another example of shock horror clutching at the last straws of the pile in a desperate effort to make a poor film generate more hype.

Wow, well, you know those shock things they use in hospitals to get your heart pumping again?

I wanted to get that guilty feeling from watching something I've been warned is too intense to watch; I wanted the shock value.

This is absolute drivel, designed to shock and titillate the 60's mindset.

Once again Bronson's talent is mostly wasted on this shock value 1984 thriller which (uncut) is far more disturbing than most of what is out even today.

After that you get the typical shock scene and it ends.

first of all, the gore in this film didn't shock me, not even the idea that someone came up with this and made it into a film - what really shocked me, is that there seems to be a market for this kind of crap.

It will probably show up on some non-premium cable channel someday just for the shock value, but after editing out the nudity (most of the violence will stay) all that will be left is 45 minutes of really bad acting interspersed with 45 minutes of commercials.

More than likely the moviemakers did this for shock factor because no one wants to see one of the main characters die.

He also carried all the shock, horror, and exploitation movies he could dig up, and I went through almost of all them.

The biggest shock to this viewer was that the pre-heist scenes were not all that bad.

The comparatively minuscule-budgeted British film (filmed in southern England though set in the Appalachians) is five-pair-of-pants terrifying, a heart-stopping shocker so stomach turning that people walk out of screenings early in shock.

SO I guess he had to go to shock value.....have them killed in the darkest of fashions.

The other fault is the naming of the characters . . . the names Sita and Radha seem contrived deliberately to shock and outrage (imagine a film in America depicting a gay relationship between a man named "Jesus" and another named "Paul"!)

Many people saw it and said, that he would be a nightmare for fathers to see their daughters bring home or a shock, but they were just friends the whole time, even towards the end.

Related words