Security
in sentence
7815 examples of Security in a sentence
When Iran and Israel's
security
imperatives dictated collaboration, they did so in spite of lethal ideological opposition to each other.
We started from social media data, we combined it statistically with data from U.S. government social security, and we ended up predicting social
security
numbers, which in the United States are extremely sensitive information.
This kind of market risk is mind-boggling, and has direct implications for not only the incentives of farmers to invest in higher productivity technology, such as modern seeds and fertilizers, but also direct implications for food
security.
They have incredibly productive ties with the
security
organizations on both sides of the border.
That might sound outlandish, but we already have cases where this has happened, for example, the case of the Flame malware which we strongly believe was authored by the U.S. government, and which, to spread, subverted the
security
of the Windows Update network, meaning here, the company was hacked by their own government.
And what this really means is that an E.U. country's intelligence agency is breaching the
security
of a telecom of a fellow E.U. country on purpose, and they discuss it in their slides completely casually, business as usual.
And to quote a fellow
security
researcher, Marcus Ranum, he said that the United States is right now treating the Internet as it would be treating one of its colonies.
And to quote a fellow
security
researcher, Haroon Meer, one country only has to make a small wave, but those small waves together become a tide, and the tide will lift all the boats up at the same time, and the tide we will build with secure, free, open-source systems, will become the tide that will lift all of us up and above the surveillance state.
And the answer is, the ability to seek goals will follow directly from this in the following sense: just like you would travel through a tunnel, a bottleneck in your future path space, in order to achieve many other diverse objectives later on, or just like you would invest in a financial security, reducing your short-term liquidity in order to increase your wealth over the long term, goal seeking emerges directly from a long-term drive to increase future freedom of action.
Downstream, this represents water
security
for millions of people and more than half of the elephants remaining on this planet.
If he was to lose his little finger tomorrow, he would not sleep tonight, but provided he never saw them, he would snore with the most profound
security
over the ruin of a hundred million of his brethren.
But the First Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees us a free press for a reason, and that's to enable an adversarial press, to challenge the government, but also to work together with the government, to have a dialogue and debate about how we can inform the public about matters of vital importance without putting our national
security
at risk.
So we should be suspicious about the same sort of overblown claims of damage to national
security
from these kind of officials.
I would argue that they have kind of a narrow conception of national
security.
There are ties of fraternity that bond us together, and if we destroy these bonds by undermining the standards, the security, the manner of behavior, that nations and citizens all around the world expect us to abide by.
They say hey, we need to work with you to secure your systems, but in reality, they're giving bad advice to these companies that makes them degrade the
security
of their services.
So by reducing the
security
of our communications, they're not only putting the world at risk, they're putting America at risk in a fundamental way, because intellectual property is the basis, the foundation of our economy, and if we put that at risk through weak security, we're going to be paying for it for years.
We don't have to give up our liberty to have
security.
I think that the — sorry, I'm getting feedback through the microphone there — the actions that he took were inappropriate because of the fact that he put people's lives at risk, basically, in the long run, and I know there's been a lot of talk in public by Mr. Snowden and some of the journalists that say that the things that have been disclosed have not put national
security
and people at risk, and that is categorically not true.
I mean, describe to us this Bullrun program where it's alleged that the NSA specifically weakened
security
in order to get the type of access that you've spoken of.
The other one is the Information Assurance mission, which is to protect the national
security
systems of the United States, and by that, that's things like the communications that the president uses, the communications that control our nuclear weapons, the communications that our military uses around the world, and the communications that we use with our allies, and that some of our allies themselves use.
That's sort of been couched as a balance between privacy and national
security.
Every industrialized nation in the world has a lawful intercept program where they are requiring companies to provide them with information that they need for their security, and the companies that are involved have complied with those programs in the same way that they have to do when they're operating in Russia or the U.K. or China or India or France, any country that you choose to name.
It is
security
and privacy.
But I think, for me, I guess, privacy and
security
are a really important thing.
We think about it in terms of both things, and I think you can't have privacy without security, so let me just talk about
security
first, because you asked about Snowden and all of that, and then I'll say a little bit about privacy.
We'll be able to see the extent of all water bodies around the whole world every day and help water
security.
From water
security
to food
security.
We all remember the three-legged retirement income stool which had the savings and pension and social
security.
With savings down, pensions becoming a relic of the past and 401(k) plans failing millions of Americans, many near-retirees are dependent on social
security
as their retirement plan.
Back
Next
Related words
National
Their
Economic
Which
Would
Countries
Global
About
Social
Policy
Other
Military
Should
International
Political
World
Could
Energy
Country
Forces
