Security in sentence

7815 examples of Security in a sentence

Life necessitates a universal world, however, we believe in the security of having a local identity.

You can find out about the latest security incident.

I'm a computer science professor, and my area of expertise is computer and information security.

And, you know, that's a perfectly reasonable thing for her to think, because I told her I was working in computer security, and it was interesting to get her perspective.

What I'm going to talk to you about today are some hacks, some real world cyberattacks that people in my community, the academic research community, have performed, which I don't think most people know about, and I think they're very interesting and scary, and this talk is kind of a greatest hits of the academic security community's hacks.

In 2006, we hit an important milestone from the perspective of computer security.

There's several examples up on the screen of situations where doctors are looking to implant devices inside of people, and all of these devices now, it's standard that they communicate wirelessly, and I think this is great, but without a full understanding of trustworthy computing, and without understanding what attackers can do and the security risks from the beginning, there's a lot of danger in this.

The results are astonishing, and when they gave this talk, even though they gave this talk at a conference to a bunch of computer security researchers, everybody was gasping.

Every security expert wants to hack a smartphone, and we tend to look at the USB port, the GPS for tracking, the camera, the microphone, but no one up till this point had looked at the accelerometer.

But it's very important, and these researchers are showing, that the developers of these things need to take security into account from the very beginning, and need to realize that they may have a threat model, but the attackers may not be nice enough to limit themselves to that threat model, and so you need to think outside of the box.

Now imagine what that means for you, your family, your friends, your personal financial security.

Imagine what it means for your personal security as a heavily armed civilian population gets angrier and angrier about why this was allowed to happen.

But my subject is national security.

But we have to do it in a way that is sensitive to meeting the food security needs of the future and the environmental security needs of the future.

But they also have rising costs to our security, economy, health and environment that are starting to erode, if not outweigh their benefits.

And whether you care most about profits and jobs and competitive advantage or national security, or environmental stewardship and climate protection and public health, reinventing fire makes sense and makes money.

But those four futures at the same cost differ profoundly in their risks, around national security, fuel, water, finance, technology, climate and health.

At about the same cost as business as usual, this would maximize national security, customer choice, entrepreneurial opportunity and innovation.

Now combine the electricity and oil revolutions, both driven by modern efficiency, and you get the really big story: reinventing fire, where business enabled and sped by smart policies in mindful markets can lead the United States completely off oil and coal by 2050, saving 5 trillion dollars, growing the economy 2.6-fold, strengthening out national security, oh, and by the way, by getting rid of the oil and coal, reducing the fossil carbon emissions by 82 to 86 percent.

You could apply the same principle, actually, to the security lanes in airports.

The kingdom argues that its laws allow it to detain or deport foreigners who pose a risk to the economy or the security or the public health or the morals of the state.

In case it's been a while since you've been sitting in a history class, here is what the Second Amendment actually says: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

Well, that would be interesting if it was true, and job security for me, but I don't think the evidence is very good.

That's the example of how legacy thinking about identity subverts the security of a well-constructed system.

And whenever I go to America, and I have to pay with a mag stripe on the back of the card, I always sign it Carlos Tethers anyway, just as a security mechanism, because if a transaction ever gets disputed, and it comes back and it says Dave Birch, I know it must have been a criminal, because I would never sign it Dave Birch.

So this nonsense about you've got to have real names on Facebook and whatever, that gets you that kind of security.

That gets you security theater, where there's no actual security, but people are sort of playing parts in a play about security.

But it's not real security.

And another example of how the context changed, and the creative process for me and for most skaters, is, you go, you get out of the car, you check for security, you check for stuff.

They connect disparate information, and they bring it together in a way that a security analyst doesn't expect.

Related words