Example collocations logo

Risks in sentence

4376 examples of Risks in a sentence

But if DuPont needed capital to produce a new chemical in an existing plant, it couldn’t get a loan, because banks don’t know how to assess the risks of innovative products (in the chemical industry or any other).
The third group includes economies – such as Brazil, several eurozone countries, and Japan – that are not growing fast enough, and face downside risks.
Export-led economies, of course, can’t take currency appreciation lightly – it undermines competitiveness and risks eroding the country’s share of the global market.
With the exception of a small number of ideologically committed defenders of free enterprise, few were willing to take the risks inherent in letting major banks collapse.
And society must bear significant additional costs in terms of the risks of spent-fuel storage and large-scale accidents.
Shutting out citizens from formal democratic processes is forcing political discontent further into the shadows, where it risks becoming militarized.
For oppositions, this is not a road without risks, but it is one worth taking.
Now, as the pendulum swings back, it risks overshooting the optimal combination of private and public activity and ending up at a simplistic view of government as the problem and the private sector as the solution.
To pretend that the Doha Round’s failure would not have negative and lasting effects for the WTO betrays a profound lack of understanding of the risks we run, as well as of the Round’s vital importance for weaker and smaller states.
NATO’s focus is on external security risks, while the SCO’s members target security issues within their own territories.
Still, the OZ program is not without risks, and much will depend on how it is implemented.
After the outsize risks of the bubble years, these trends could be a sign that the system is reverting to historical norms.
And, while a more balkanized financial system does reduce the likelihood of global shocks creating volatility in far-flung markets, it may also concentrate risks within local banking systems and increase the chance of domestic financial crises.
Policymakers must weigh the risks of volatility, exchange-rate pressures, and vulnerability to sudden reversals in capital flows against the benefits of wider access to credit and enhanced competition.
If the ECB grossly understates the risks, its credibility as a regulator will be badly tarnished.
If it is more forthright about the risks, there is a chance that some periphery countries might have difficulty plugging the holes, and will require help from the north.
After all, it was many of those same lobbyists who in the past managed to convince legislators to insert clauses and provisions that contributed so much to the lax standards that created the systemic risks for which taxpayers are now being forced to pay.
Moreover, several risks lie ahead.
Second, while the ECB’s actions have reduced tail risks in the eurozone – a Greek exit and/or loss of market access for Italy and Spain – the monetary union’s fundamental problems have not been resolved.
Finally, serious geopolitical risks loom large.
While the chance of a perfect storm – with all of these risks materializing in their most virulent form – is low, any one of them alone would be enough to stall the global economy and tip it into recession.
As 2013 begins, the downside risks to the global economy are gathering force.
Europeans have recognized that good systems of social protection can even lead to improved overall economic performance, as individuals are more willing to take the risks that lead to higher economic growth.
Moral hazard has been curtailed but the risks of investing in emerging markets increased.
Those risks are now reflected in market prices, which is the source of today's problem.
But agricultural experts have warned of the risks of the flagging efforts to boost food output since the 1980’s.
NATO expansion risks upsetting the network of understandings, assumptions and agreements on which this new security order rests.
But investors, managers, and entrepreneurs must take risks if their ideas stand any chance of achieving commercial success.
The EU has long-established institutions and processes for evaluating risk and ensuring that unacceptable risks are avoided.
Rather, the precautionary principle should be used judiciously and rationally, balancing potential risks with the benefits that innovation and new technology might offer.
BackNext