Example collocations logo

Risks in sentence

4376 examples of Risks in a sentence

In economic terms, that means broadening the assessment of inflation risks from a focus on domestic “output gaps” – the difference between actual and potential (or full employment) GDP – to the global output gap.
The US is a net debtor with an aging population, unfunded entitlement spending on social security and health care, an anemic economic recovery, and risks of continued monetization of the fiscal deficit.
As for Turkey, its only hope to avoid an even deeper economic crisis is to take determined action to mitigate the economic risks that have been allowed to accrue over the last few years.
But this is a dangerous notion, one that entails not just massive risks, but also unacceptably high interim human costs.
The rise in the death toll is caused by terrorists responding rationally to the higher risks imposed by greater security measures.
By expanding humanitarian aid with no strings attached, the US could do more to address hunger, disease, and poverty, while reaping considerable benefits to its standing and lowering terror risks.
To avoid exposing themselves to claims of negligence or even, in rare cases, criminal assault, doctors must disclose an ever increasing amount of information, however bleak, about treatment risks, benefits, and alternatives, enabling the patient to give “informed consent.”
If he succeeds as a super Keynes, no one will have had to take any risks with their own political future.
But there is a difference between hoping for an outcome and going to great lengths – and incurring great risks – to help bring it about.
Investors must look at the specific risks and rewards of the project in front of them.
They are unlikely to be drawn toward infrastructure projects until they get some help in dealing with the potential risks.
Despite securitization’s bad name since the United States subprime mortgage crisis, pooling and distributing highly concentrated risks can attract a larger group of potential investors with the right risk tolerance.
More money and more projects can help, but only more transparency and a clearer view of risks will jump-start progress.
Indeed, as industrial production migrates to East Asia and innovation remains in North America, Europe risks losing its position in the most attractive international markets.
To be sure, the ratio is a factor that would help us to assess risks of negative feedback, since the government must refinance short-term debt sooner, and, if the crisis pushes up interest rates, the authorities will face intense pressures for fiscal austerity sooner or later.
And, indeed, the security risks facing Asia are only growing – exemplified in China’s move from military expansion to blatant assertiveness.
The risks to stability in Northeast Asia extend well beyond North Korea’s nuclear weapons and missile programs, and a joint intelligence agenda should address them.
Whatever their historical disagreements, South Korea and Japan both face serious risks in their immediate neighborhood.
Many international observers have been worried about the country’s oversupply of housing and the related credit boom, making me wonder whether I have been overly sanguine about these risks.
There are too many risks – human error, technical flaws, negligence, cyber attacks, and more – to believe that these weapons will never be used.
The new emphasis on national interests clearly has costs and risks.
Until recently, most banks focused on their country of origin, so risks largely arose under national systems of supervision.
Though the world’s attention is currently fixed on the risks of an escalating Sino-American trade war, the threat of an equally destructive transatlantic conflict cannot be ignored.
The extent to which that transformation is positive will depend on how we navigate the risks and opportunities that arise along the way.
But it also could lead to the marginalization of some groups, exacerbate inequality, create new security risks, and undermine human relationships.
Many argue that bankers’ belief that their institutions are too big to fail and that their jobs are safe encourages them to underestimate the risks that they assume.
But this approach suffers from a fatal fallacy: if booms are fueled by underestimation of risks, and regulation is made more sensitive to the estimation of risks, booms will be bigger and busts deeper.
The second way to reduce the financial system’s sensitivity to risk-estimation errors is to limit the flow of risks to institutions with a structural, rather than a statistical, capacity for holding that risk.
In the past, risks with volatility of similar statistical magnitudes were considered to be fungible, and,could flow to whomever was prepared to bear them.
But, while banks with short-term funding and many branches originating loans have a deep capacity for holding credit risks, they have a limited capacity for holding market risks, and little capacity for holding liquidity risk.
BackNext