Example collocations logo

Revenue in sentence

1117 examples of Revenue in a sentence

The potential recession risk of a budget deal can be avoided by phasing in the base-broadening that is used to raise revenue.
Even if the full deduction for charitable gifts is preserved and only high-value health insurance is regarded as a tax expenditure, the extra revenue in 2013 would be about $150 billion.
Over a decade, that implies nearly $2 trillion in additional revenue without any increase in tax rates from today’s levels.
Extra revenue of $150 billion in 2013 would be 1% of GDP, and could be too much for the economy to swallow, particularly if combined with reductions in government spending and a rise in the payroll tax.
A 5% cap on the tax-expenditure benefits would raise only $75 billion in 2013, about 0.5% of GDP; but the cap could be reduced from 5% to 2% over the next few years, raising substantially more revenue when the economy is stronger.
The Trump plan concedes that the tax cut per se would reduce revenue by at least $2.6 trillion over ten years – and its authors are willing to cite the non-partisan Tax Foundation on this point.
The supposed increases in government revenue are based on an analysis that reads like word salad – I don’t recall ever seeing a document from a major party candidate that was so completely incoherent.
What would really happen is this: The big tax cut would help relatively few people, while also cutting federal government revenue sharply.
The Last Bastion of a Profitable PressNEW DELHI – Around the world, newspapers seem to be facing imminent extinction, as a mass exodus to the Internet causes their circulation to slump and their advertising revenue to collapse.
As advertising revenue has been vacuumed up by the Internet giants Facebook and Google, newspaper profits have plunged.
In sharp contrast with the Western experience, advertising remains the Indian newspaper industry’s main source of revenue.
Meanwhile, TV and print advertising revenue are also growing, at 8% and 4.5%, respectively.
But even then, India’s print media will enjoy a healthy stream of advertising revenue that their Western counterparts can only dream about.
But Russia remains essentially a “rentier state” – that is, a state whose primary source of revenue is rent – in this case, oil and gas – rather than taxation, which thus keeps demands for political representation at bay.
Those commodities account for over two thirds of the country’s export earnings, and are the primary source of state revenue.
This requires reasonable projections for domestic tax revenue and aid, as well as the right mix of foreign expertise to support the process.
This gap represents €1.2 trillion ($1.4 trillion) from 2010-2018, or approximately €500 billion lost in terms of tax revenue.
Most of the public-debt increase in the US and elsewhere is not due to any kind of discretionary fiscal stimulus; it’s all about the loss of tax revenue that comes with a deep recession.
As Internet giants siphon away advertising revenue from traditional media outlets, social media have become many people’s main source of news.
An optimistic premise of those who argue for tax cuts is that the income-tax cut they envisage will boost output and hence earnings so much that it will cause little loss of tax revenue.
America must reform its tax code to raise revenue across a wider array of people and economic activity (half the US population pays no federal income tax, and the tax code either excludes or favorably treats many income sources).
In the last budget, revenue from amnesties amounted to eight billion euros, and the fiscal reductions for businesses were 7.5 billion euros.
The US can raise additional revenue with which to address inequality in fiscally responsible ways.
Once issued, technologies developed from these patents could benefit millions of farmers and lead to commercial products that generate lucrative new revenue sources.
Fundamental tax reform must strengthen incentives, reduce distorting “tax expenditures,” and raise revenue.
Reducing the budget deficit by 10% of GDP would mean an enormous cut in government spending or a dramatic rise in tax revenue – or, more likely, both.
Depressing economic activity further through higher taxes and reduced government spending would cause offsetting reductions in tax revenue and offsetting increases in transfer payments to the unemployed.
The increased demand for Greek goods and services would raise Greece’s GDP, increasing tax revenue and reducing transfer payments.
That boost, in turn, generates $50 billion of extra tax revenue, implying a net addition to the national debt of only $50 billion.
Assuming that continued subnormal output casts a 10% shadow on future potential output levels, that extra $150 billion of production means that in the future, when the economy has recovered, there will be an extra $15 billion of output – and an extra $5 billion of tax revenue.
BackNext