Resolution
in sentence
1375 examples of Resolution in a sentence
That
resolution
would, at least partly, take the form of a book.
So a major effort to construct a cross-border
resolution
framework is under way.
The agreement with Iran can still be salvaged, precisely because it is a multilateral agreement, endorsed by the UN Security Council
(Resolution
2231), not an agreement solely between the US and Iran.
The EU should be prepared to use the WTO dispute
resolution
process against the US, and to bring its case to the UN Security Council and General Assembly.
In December, he blasted then-President Barack Obama’s decision to abstain from a vote on a UN Security Council
resolution
condemning Israel’s illegal settlement construction, instead of vetoing the measure.
By December 2016, Obama was allowing the UN Security Council to vote on that Trump-derided
resolution
declaring Israel’s settlement construction a “major obstacle” to a two-state solution.
Last year, the United Nations Human Rights Council approved a
resolution
affirming that, “rights that people have offline must also be protected online, in particular freedom of expression.”
Although the UN Human Rights Council’s
resolution
to protect online freedoms is not binding, it offers a starting point for ensuring that governments allow citizens to use the Internet as a tool for maximizing political participation.
The report challenges the core principles of a faith-driven administration and of a president whose political gospel led him to a sharp departure from the culture of conflict
resolution
in favor of a crusade based on raw power.
In fact, this ill-advised war – launched on the basis of a United Nations Security Council
resolution
– has been grinding on for 11 years, making it the longest in American history.
The Iraq war and Israel’s wars with Hamas and Hezbollah show the limits of what military power can achieve, as well as vindicate diplomacy and conflict
resolution.
Of course, military intervention for purposes beyond defending one’s country remains possible, but requires a UN Security Council
resolution.
Just two years ago, the Council approved a
resolution
authorizing a military intervention in Libya – the first
resolution
to implement the “responsibility to protect” (R2P) principle, which the general assembly adopted unanimously in 2005.
Brazil has attempted to address the issue by crafting a
resolution
that would decouple the R2P mandate from the use of force – effectively eliminating the possibility that the doctrine could be applied.
As for the Palestinian question, Israel’s new alliances surely will not help advance a
resolution.
In state-dominated systems like China’s, developing an effective PRI – delineating market participants’ rights and responsibilities, ensuring the exchange platform’s transparency, and creating a fair and equitable process of dispute
resolution
– is particularly challenging, because the state acts as a regulator, asset owner, enterprise operator, and competitor in the market.
It would certainly help if the EU promised substantial development funds, including for
resolution
of property issues, once an agreement is in place.
And, though the circumstances and the “legal” environment are very different – there is a UN
resolution
for the Libya intervention, and a vague declaration of support by the Arab League – Sarkozy’s stance reminds some of George W. Bush’s enthusiasm for war.
A US veto of a Security Council
resolution
– supported by the Council’s 14 other members – to oppose Israeli settlements seemed to signal that Obama had crumbled under pressure from America’s pro-Israel lobby.
Which brings us to the burning question: Will the US-China trade conflict end with a peaceful
resolution
or an acrimonious divorce?
On May 17, the European Parliament adopted a
resolution
criticizing legislation in Hungary that would force CEU to shut down.
Though this connection has lost some importance, the fact is that, of 199 EPP members who voted, 107 voted opposed the May 17 resolution, and 40 abstained, leaving just 67 voting in favor.
Any
resolution
– any suggestion of change – will engender new conflicts because of conflicting claims of sovereignty.
That agreement focuses on trade in goods and services, trade facilitation, rules of origin, and dispute
resolution.
US Secretary of State John Kerry, in his bid for an Israeli-Palestinian settlement, operated as if conflict
resolution
could be achieved through non-coercive solutions, deriving from the good will of the relevant parties.
If the US cannot provide this today, it must relinquish its monopoly on international conflict
resolution.
If Iran’s nuclear program demands negotiations with the five permanent members of the UN Security Council, plus Germany, and North Korea’s requires the so-called “six-party talks,” why should the
resolution
of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict be left exclusively to the US?
Under a truly international paradigm, the principles underlying a peace deal – two states along the 1967 border (with territorial swaps to accommodate Israel’s settlement blocs), two capitals in Jerusalem, an agreed solution to the refugee problem, and robust security arrangements – could be enshrined in a Security Council
resolution.
Meanwhile, in the United Kingdom, the House of Commons recently passed a
resolution
along the same lines as the proposed US legislation.
At its core, a democratic system is simply a legal framework – underpinned by a constitution – that facilitates discussion and dispute
resolution.
Back
Next
Related words
Which
Conflict
Would
Their
There
Could
Should
Crisis
International
Other
About
Between
Political
Peaceful
Without
Against
After
Through
Countries
Banking