Example collocations logo

Regulations in sentence

1305 examples of Regulations in a sentence

With Trump removing friction-causing regulations and inspiring stock-market confidence, the Bank of Japan may finally be able to limit the yen’s appreciation, thereby spurring inflation, employment, and the stock market.
A much better way forward is to rethink seriously the role of cross-border capital-account regulations.
A particular linguistic twist is also involved here: domestic financial regulations are called by that name, but if they involve cross-border flows, they are called “controls.”
A serious discussion of global capital-account regulations would benefit both advanced and emerging-market economies.
This is why capital-account regulations are allowed under IMF rules, and why the attempt to introduce capital-account convertibility into the IMF’s Articles of Agreement was defeated in 1997.
Such a reform would also serve as a mechanism of coordination at the international level, since coordinated capital-account regulations by recipient countries would be difficult to achieve.
Many regulations make sense, as the IMF has recognized in several cases.
Most countries have the basic market infrastructure and regulations, but enforcement and supervision is often weak.
In September, the Treasury Department provided new regulations to philanthropic foundations that relaxed the perceived barriers to “mission-related investments.”
But by making ourselves more sensitive to their presence and becoming aware of the distorted incentives to which they give rise, as well as by imposing regulations that limit their scope and increasing the amount of required disclosure, we can mitigate their consequences, both in the public and the private sector.
Perhaps skilled workers will try to band together to get governments to pass laws and regulations making it more difficult for firms to make their jobs obsolete.
The Trump administration has cut taxes and slashed regulations in the hope of boosting productivity growth.
Its politicians and officials have translated the vague trinity of liberty, equality, and fraternity into a concrete form: 80,000 pages of laws that cover rights and regulations from the bedroom to the factory floor.
Since 1980, regulations have been progressively relaxed until they practically disappeared.
Countries like Poland, where unregulated small businesses are generating nearly all the new jobs and growth, worry about the costs of Brussels regulations.
Moreover, in October, the IMF is set to release official “rules of the road” for the use of capital-account regulations.
Although full pricing of carbon would be a far better way to address climate change, most governments apparently prefer to rely on subsidies and regulations that increase the profitability of investments in renewable energy.
As a result, his administration has been using executive orders to roll back many of the regulations that former US President Barack Obama introduced.
While battles over energy and environmental laws may dominate the headlines, the biggest economic impact will come from reversing bank regulations.
Many regulations play this standard-setting role.
As the new regulations prove ineffective (not surprising, given the overabundance of scams and mis-selling in finance), a vicious circle is set in motion, with additional regulation resulting in further failure – and more regulation.
Obamacare and Effective GovernmentBERKELEY – When historians look back on the United States’ Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), President Barack Obama’s controversial 2010 health-care reform, we predict that they will not devote much attention to its regulations, its troubled insurance exchanges, or its website’s flawed launch.
Policymakers in the developing world are making a choice to impose what the WHO calls “overly restrictive regulations” on morphine and other essential palliative medicines.
It was the choice of governments to loosen regulations on finance and aim for full cross-border capital mobility, just as it was a choice to maintain these policies largely intact, despite a massive global financial crisis.
In this, the conservatives have it right: Let’s reduce the power of the federal government and turn more revenues and regulations back to the states, subject to the constitutional limits on the division of powers and fundamental rights.
My own state would thrive in such a looser federation, using its increased margin of maneuver to tighten its own regulations and to scale up its social services with the savings in taxes now paid to the federal government.
But it also requires that they harmonize their domestic rules and regulations – such as product-safety standards and bank regulations – with those of other member states in order to ensure they do not act as indirect trade barriers.
Subsidies, domestic-content requirements, investment regulations, and, yes, often import barriers were critical to the creation of new, higher-value industries.
With the TPP, Vietnam gets some assurance of continued access to the US market (existing barriers on the US side are already quite low), but in return must submit to restrictions on subsidies, patent rules, and investment regulations.
Ultimately, however, I suspect that competition and innovation will survive the forthcoming regulations.
BackNext