Referendum
in sentence
1313 examples of Referendum in a sentence
Once the election gambit failed, Labour would almost surely support a referendum, which is backed by 85% of its members.
Only a few Conservatives would then be needed to create a
referendum
majority, and they might find themselves with an unexpected ally: Theresa May.
For May, a
referendum
could be the key that unlocks the cage in which her own “red lines” have trapped her.
Once it was clear that the only option for leaving the EU would be to crash out with no deal, May could honestly claim that she had followed the mandate from the 2016
referendum
to deliver Brexit, but that this would involve more disruption than predicted.
Much more likely is that a new
referendum
would reject a no-deal Brexit, not just because of the economic risks, but also because the demographic balance of the UK population has shifted in favor of pro-European voters by around one million since 2016.
In short, a new
referendum
to break the impending parliamentary deadlock would probably mean that Britain remains in Europe and May remains in Downing Street.
On June 23, when voters in Britain cast their ballots in the
referendum
on the question, they need to consider what is actually involved in leaving the EU – and how the free-trade benefits they now enjoy (and take for granted) could be maintained after Brexit.
The Tories clearly didn’t expect their comprehensive victory, and some argue that it was the party’s promise to hold a
referendum
on European Union membership that made it possible.
But the salient fact is that by early spring 2016, with the Brexit
referendum
just three months away, Whitehall and the government had, in essence, lost all sway over policy.
After the “Leave” camp won the referendum, the Conservative Party, split over withdrawal from the EU, responded with a change in leadership from David Cameron to Theresa May and a significant shift in focus for May’s new government.
If young people had participated in the Brexit
referendum
in similar numbers, the UK would have voted “Remain.”
Just prior to the June 2016 Brexit referendum, Gove, who was justice secretary in David Cameron’s government at the time, dismissed the all-but-unanimous view of economists and others that a decision to leave the European Union would deeply damage the British economy.
Prime Minister Theresa May opposed Brexit prior to the referendum, but now embraces it as the occupant of 10 Downing Street.
In the midterm elections, which Trump himself described as a
referendum
on his presidency, the Democratic candidates for both the House and Senate vastly outpolled their Republican opponents.
By the time of the United Kingdom’s Brexit
referendum
in June, experts had already been deemed dispensable.
The upcoming
referendum
on Britain’s EU membership is a case in point.
Negotiating the details of Britain’s relationship with Europe, whatever the outcome, will take years; but ameliorating the polarization caused by the
referendum
will take even longer.
Indeed, the deep polarization resulting from the Brexit
referendum
recalls previous episodes that shook up political allegiances and broke up old friendships.
By calling a referendum, Britain has introduced a deep and fundamental conflict into its political sphere.
As for the EU itself, she promises to follow in the UK’s footsteps, renegotiating the terms of her country’s membership, and then calling a
referendum
on the agreement.
Indeed, part of the reason the United Kingdom’s economy has held up well (so far) since last year’s Brexit
referendum
is that the pound fell sharply, boosting competitiveness.
The trigger may have been outgoing Prime Minister George Papandreou’s ill-advised decision to call for a
referendum
on the EU’s rescue package (which implies further severe austerity measures); but the fundamental problem is that a brutal recession made the government’s demise all but inevitable.
Even worse for financial stability, Papandreou’s announcement of a
referendum
provoked German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Nicolas Sarkozy to break an important taboo.
Opinion polls show that support for the EU has surged in many member states since the UK’s
referendum.
Rather, many Europeans share the view that former British Prime Minister David Cameron blundered by calling for a
referendum
on EU membership.
Immediately after the referendum, German Chancellor Angela Merkel beseeched Europeans not to be needlessly “horrid” (garstig) when thinking about the EU’s divorce terms for the UK.
That points to the third doom loop: migration, which weighed so heavily on the outcome of the Brexit
referendum.
The Battle Cry of the Non-OppressedTEL AVIV – Nobody should be surprised that Scotland’s recent
referendum
on independence left the United Kingdom intact.
In the run-up to the referendum, Scotland’s independence movement became an important point of reference for Catalans and Basques in Spain, the Flemish in Belgium, the Veneto and South Tyrol regions in Italy, Corsicans and Bretons in France, and the secessionists of Quebec.
The United States and Spain did it in their civil wars, and today’s Spain would go to the outer limits of its capacity to prevent a Catalan or Basque referendum, let alone independence.
Back
Next
Related words
Would
Which
Voters
Election
Membership
Could
Government
Independence
Campaign
After
Their
Second
Political
Should
Country
Leave
Since
About
Constitutional
Result