Pension
in sentence
830 examples of Pension in a sentence
The authorities are taking strong action to curb pollution, improve energy efficiency, implement
pension
reform, and expand access to health care and low-cost housing.
The new paper opens a different path: it suggests revising and harmonizing national accounting, in order to gauge better the vulnerability of eurozone members’ public finances; ensuring that banks’ creditors, rather than governments, pay when crisis strikes; decentralizing fiscal discipline by requiring each country to adopt a constitutional rule on the stability of the debt ratio; and curbing countries’ contingent liabilities by adjusting
pension
systems to demographic ageing.
Pension
funds and other equity investors would incur further losses.
The World Bank report also points out that, as a consequence of banking retrenchment, institutional investors with long-term liabilities – such as
pension
funds, insurers, and sovereign wealth funds – may be called upon to assume a greater role in funding long-term assets.
South Africa now allows
pension
funds to account for wider systemic risks and opportunities, as well as social and environmental factors, when establishing asset managers’ mandates.
These shareholders are represented by institutional investors
(pension
funds, etc.) whose interests, agendas, and cozy relationships often align them more closely with firms’ CEOs and managers.
Every time a poor pregnant woman must bribe an orderly to get a hospital bed (to which she is entitled), or else deliver her baby on the floor; every time a widow cannot get the
pension
that should be hers by right, without bribing a clerk to process the papers; and every time a son cannot obtain his father’s death certificate without greasing the palm of a petty municipal official, Indians know that the system has failed them.
The high rate of household saving in China reflects many factors, including the risk of job loss and the lack of a reliable government
pension
program.
The Chinese government recently modified the tax law to exclude employers’ contributions to employee
pension
plans from taxable income and to allow the funds in those plans to accumulate tax-free.
The current cohort of Republican governors offers similarly innovative state-level solutions – for example, on spending, debt, and unfunded
pension
and health liabilities – as models for the country.
Dealing with the deficit has required difficult decisions – from reforming the welfare system and increasing the state
pension
age to controlling public-sector pay.
New legislation will slow the growth of
pension
benefits substantially, and the Monti government’s increase in taxes on owner-occupied real estate will raise significant revenue without the adverse incentive effects that would occur if rates for personal-income, payroll, or value-added taxes were raised.
Central banks do not completely deny the economic costs that these policies imply: exuberance in financial markets, financing gaps in funded
pension
systems, and deeper wealth inequality, to name just a few.
In Japan, the CEO of a major bank would have apologized to his employees and his country, and would have refused his
pension
and bonus so that those who suffered as a result of corporate failures could share the money.
But arguably the most important lesson learned in Iraq resulted from the almost catastrophic decision to decommission Saddam’s army without pay or
pension.
That means lower loan-to-value ratios, stricter mortgage-underwriting standards, limits on second-home financing, higher counter-cyclical capital buffers for mortgage lending, higher permanent capital charges for mortgages, and restrictions on the use of
pension
funds for down payments on home purchases.
The PPP bandwagon has three essential components: an explosion in infrastructure finance (backed by
pension
and other large funds); the creation of “pipelines” of lucrative mega-PPP projects to exploit countries’ raw materials; and the dismantling of environmental and social safeguards.
Its new Global Infrastructure Facility (GIF) will mobilize global
pension
and sovereign wealth funds to invest in infrastructure as a specific asset class.
Even staid
pension
funds and sovereign wealth funds have increased their allocations to emerging-market assets.
By contrast, when firms and workers are informal, workers receive a similar bundle of health and
pension
benefits for free.
Over the next several years, as the traded or tradable share of the state-owned sector’s market capitalization increased from today’s low base of 10-15%, more institutional investors, such as
pension
funds and insurance companies, would become involved in Chinese equity trading, which is currently dominated by retail investors.
Insurance-based systems of entitlements created by personal contributions are increasingly taking the place of national health and
pension
services.
There is thus a real need in the Franc Zone for a financing institution that would convert migrant remittances into productive investments, thereby generating jobs and wealth, and that would broaden access to banking services, mortgages, insurance products,
pension
plans, and technical assistance.
If there were no longevity risk – that is, if the probability of dying at each age in the future were reliably known – then
pension
funds could easily offer life annuities to large numbers of people by investing their assets in bonds of various maturities in order to pay out just the right amount each year.
But
pension
funds cannot do this, because they risk running out of money if, on average, people turn out to live longer than expected.
BNP Paribas hoped to place the bonds with UK
pension
funds, but so far the issue has not been fully subscribed.
Life insurance companies, drug firms, businesses providing services for the elderly, and investors in retirement real estate would all benefit from increased longevity, while defined-benefit
pension
plans and annuity providers would lose.
There is another reason the proposal will not be effective: many of the largest shareowners are institutions that don’t pay tax anyway, such as
pension
funds and foundations.
Worse yet, the burden of banking losses that will sooner or later be socialized, and that of future unfunded public
pension
and health costs, are often understated in official debt figures.
In June 2009, the largest US
pension
fund (Calpers) owned less than 0.3% of large companies such as Coca Cola and Microsoft.
Back
Next
Related words
Funds
System
Government
Their
Reform
Public
Which
Insurance
Would
Systems
Companies
Benefits
Investors
Retirement
Reforms
Countries
Private
Assets
Health
Years