Example collocations logo

Ownership in sentence

752 examples of Ownership in a sentence

This was never as successful in Europe as it was in the United States, where share ownership is more widespread.
What is really limiting private infrastructure investment is, to some extent, public opposition to the private ownership of public assets and, mainly, impediments to matching private capital with infrastructure opportunities.
This model has involved substantial liberalization in terms of official ideology, the economy, and society, while maintaining public ownership of the major banks and largest state-owned enterprises (SOEs) as “anchors of economic stability.”
Fully 90.6% of US families in the highest decile of the income distribution owned stocks – double the 45% ownership share of the other 90%.
These accounts should be frozen, despite the difficulty in doing so in a world rife with secret banking and nominee accounts that disguise true ownership.
Of course, it is not the EU’s prerogative to dictate the terms of the conflict’s resolution, and it is clear that local ownership will be key to any deal that may emerge from the process.
But there may be another reason why Czechs are more supportive of reform, and it may be related to the sense of empowerment they feel as a result of bold ownership reforms put into effect by the Klaus government.
Significantly, unlike in Russia and other transition countries, Czech privatization did not confer special property rights on managers and other enterprise insiders (who are likely to have many ties to the old regime and thus unlikely to become convinced supporters of the new one), but spread ownership rights over the widest spectrum of general population.
He repudiated its traditional socialist ideology, rewriting the party's constitution to remove all references to state ownership.
Investors are rightly nervous about how political reform will evolve; whether the government can maintain the fragile peace between ethnic groups; and how regulation and ownership rights will develop.
State ownership is low, and is viewed as aberrational when it occurs (such as the government takeovers of General Motors and Chrysler in recent years, from which officials are rushing to exit).
That would be plausible if American corporate ownership were concentrated and powerful, with major shareholders owning, say, 25% of a company’s stock – a structure common in most other advanced countries, where families, foundations, or financial institutions more often have that kind of authority inside large firms.
Ownership in large American firms is diffuse, with block-holding shareholders scarce, even today.
These tiny outcroppings have little material value, and yet the dispute over their ownership has led to a major international dustup.
And I have not even mentioned such minor things as tax reform, pension reform, and privatizing land ownership.
Among the reforms will be tax policies aimed at boosting rural purchasing power, measures to broaden rural land ownership, and technology-led programs to raise agricultural productivity.
This has resulted in a market economy that retains private ownership, but that looks very different from other market economies, such as America's.
A tripartite system of big, closely held corporations, big industrial unions and government mediate conflicts and block changes through barriers to entry, control over licenses and standards, sway over big banks, golden shares and, in some countries, state ownership of key enterprises.
Many are happy about growing home ownership, but are unhappy about the scarcity of public spaces – safe streets, parks, arts facilities, and community centers – where they can come into contact with their fellow citizens.
With private ownership established, market mechanisms could restore efficiency.
Thaksin’s ownership of the Manchester City football club might not seem of great importance to observers outside Thailand and Asia.
Thaksin’s ownership is a source of considerable pride, especially outside elite circles in Bangkok.
Without necessarily affecting the operations of AIG’s insurance subsidiaries, the reorganization process would have simply shifted ownership of AIG’s assets from AIG’s existing shareholders to AIG’s creditors.
But a reorganization of AIG and a shift in its ownership should not have been expected to endanger insurance policyholders.
Thus, state ownership tends naturally to remove one of the key pillars of an inclusive society.
The ownership is local.
With widespread ownership of mobile phones and Internet-connected computers, it is far easier than ever before to organize supporters and allies.
Rather, sustainable, pro-poor growth is the key, requiring political stability – that is, peace and security for individuals – good governance, and ownership of policies by all stakeholders.
In financially risky countries, China now demands majority ownership up front.
China’s leaders should recognize that, if the Silk Road economic belt is to reach its potential, it must be based on a broader vision that includes diversity of financing, multiplicity of ownership, and effective organization involving a range of actors.
BackNext