Nuclear
in sentence
6244 examples of Nuclear in a sentence
The red line is what is done in most
nuclear
reactors.
Now, it's kind of nuts to work on a new
nuclear
reactor.
So, this is my latest cooker, and if this looks more complicated than the
nuclear
reactor, that's because it is.
This is
nuclear
power.
Nuclear
power runs scenarios on a regular basis in order to practice what they hope will never occur.
140 million Americans voted for the next president of the United States, and yet, as all of us knows, in a few weeks time, somebody is going to hand over the
nuclear
launch codes to Donald J. Trump.
Humanity was buying everything from crude oil to
nuclear
reactors.
You can use your energy to build
nuclear
bombs and spread the darkness of destruction, or you can use it to spread the joy of light to millions.
The full scope of a
nuclear
detonation is almost unimaginable.
But there is a scientifically supported plan of action that could save hundreds of thousands of lives in the area surrounding a
nuclear
explosion.
To create their destructive blast, these weapons harness the power of
nuclear
fission– in which an atom’s nucleus is split in two.
And though it may sound surprising, the best way to stay protected before, during, and after a
nuclear
detonation, is getting inside.
As the fireball cools, unstable atoms created by the
nuclear
fission mix with the debris to produce the most dangerous long-term effect of a
nuclear
detonation: radioactive particles called fallout.
Nuclear
weapons are some of the most powerful tools of destruction on Earth, and it may seem naive to put faith in these straightforward protective measures.
And then, the 92
nuclear
power plants that it would take to provide the power would fill up the rest of Los Angeles.
That's roughly a third more
nuclear
power than all of France creates.
If the expansion of the universe continues to accelerate, it will eventually overcome not only the gravitational force – tearing apart galaxies and solar systems– but also the electromagnetic, weak, and strong
nuclear
forces which hold atoms and nuclei together.
So, a big question that we're facing now and have been for quite a number of years now: are we at risk of a
nuclear
attack?
Now, there's a bigger question that's probably actually more important than that, is the notion of permanently eliminating the possibility of a
nuclear
attack, eliminating the threat altogether.
And I would like to make a case to you that over the years since we first developed atomic weaponry, until this very moment, we've actually lived in a dangerous
nuclear
world that's characterized by two phases, which I'm going to go through with you right now.
First of all, we started off the
nuclear
age in 1945.
And in 1945, we were the only
nuclear
power.
We had a few
nuclear
weapons, two of which we dropped on Japan, in Hiroshima, a few days later in Nagasaki, in August 1945, killing about 250,000 people between those two.
And for a few years, we were the only
nuclear
power on Earth.
But by 1949, the Soviet Union had decided it was unacceptable to have us as the only
nuclear
power, and they began to match what the United States had developed.
And from 1949 to 1985 was an extraordinary time of a buildup of a
nuclear
arsenal that no one could possibly have imagined back in the 1940s.
After 1985, and before the break up of the Soviet Union, we began to disarm from a
nuclear
point of view.
We began to counter-proliferate, and we dropped the number of
nuclear
warheads in the world to about a total of 21,000.
They could be "re-commissioned," but the way they count things, which is very complicated, we think we have about a third of the
nuclear
weapons we had before.
But we also, in that period of time, added two more members to the
nuclear
club: Pakistan and North Korea.
Back
Next
Related words
Weapons
Would
Power
Program
Which
Their
World
Could
Energy
About
International
Countries
Other
Country
Military
There
Security
Threat
Agreement
Global