Example collocations logo

Multilateralism in sentence

397 examples of Multilateralism in a sentence

It emphasized multilateralism, including through the United Nations, and promoted free trade.
But even Trump’s America still needs Liberal Order 1.0 – and the multilateralism that underpins it.
Vladimir Putin’s Soviet DreamMADRID – The recent nuclear deal concluded by six major world powers and Iran represented a triumph of multilateralism.
But the value of multilateralism itself transcends any particular program or policy.
After helping Europe recover from the ruins of World War II, multilateralism gave countries a common purpose: to improve their citizens’ wellbeing and quality of life.
Beyond any economic metric, we should measure the success of multilateralism in wars not fought and lives not lost.
If multilateralism is not delivering all that we want, the solution is not to give up on it.
In his recent speech before the US Congress, Macron called for a “new breed of multilateralism … effective, accountable and results-oriented,” a multilateralism that “will allow our cultures and identities to be respected, to be protected, and to flourish freely together.”
Meanwhile, for developing countries that lack China’s economic might, the trend away from multilateralism could hurt.
In Syria, only multilateralism can succeed.
Effective multilateralism is a key facet of this vision.
Managing them requires a clear position in favor of global governance and effective multilateralism at all levels.
Indeed, the times require a new multilateralism as the foundation of a new and sustainable prosperity for all.
The move was blocked, partly by the same fear of multilateralism that held back the Thatcher government 30 years ago.
Third, even if America under Obama praises and even practices multilateralism, Americans are far from ready to accept the reality of a multi-polar world.
In contrast to America’s engagement in multilateralism, or Europe’s search for reconciliation through a plethora of common institutions, power politics is much more a part of Asia’s twentieth-century legacy.
Standing up for multilateralism and international rule of law may not only be the morally right thing to do; it is also in the interests of America's allies and, ultimately, America itself.
The JCPOA was a landmark of multilateralism.
Despite that – or, perhaps, because of his disregard for multilateralism in all forms – US President Donald Trump has called it the “stupidest deal of all time,” and predicted that it would “lead to a nuclear holocaust.”
The EU has multilateralism in its DNA.
And China, long reticent about multilateralism, has committed to upholding – even leading – international cooperation.
At the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, last month, he asserted that multilateralism is critical to our collective future.
While this does not necessarily imply a military role for Europe in Asia (although participation in peacekeeping missions should not be excluded), it does mean a more forceful diplomatic posture in support of mediation and multilateralism.
South of the US border, many countries perceive that Kerry embraces multilateralism, while Bush rejects it.
Increasingly brazen attacks on multilateralism and the international rule of law threaten to destroy the postwar global system that was created – with the UN as its vital pillar – to ensure that history would not repeat itself.
After all, it stands for multilateralism and the rule of law, whereas Trump advocates bilateral deal making and the rule of force.
If France and Germany can barely manage any progress in the European context, how can they be expected to lead the world back toward multilateralism and the rule of law?
The fact that it took almost 50 years to draft and finally achieve the necessary ratification threshold demonstrates that something is very wrong with the modern system of multilateralism.
Only with an open attitude can Western leaders ensure that Chinese-led institutions adopt best practices of multilateralism and accountability, and that they adhere to international labor and environmental standards.
But multilateralism is much easier to advocate than to design and implement.
BackNext