Leadership
in sentence
4104 examples of Leadership in a sentence
The message to China’s new
leadership
is unmistakable: There has never been a more urgent time to get on with the heavy lifting of rebalancing and reform.
It remains a blueprint that China’s new
leadership
cannot ignore.
Now, South Korean military leaders are warning that if North Korea attacks again, it will face retaliation not just against the proximate source of those attacks, but against the North’s command
leadership.
Whether an “establishment” figure – one backed by the party leadership, such as former Florida Governor Jeb Bush or New Jersey Governor Chris Christie – can catch on with voters will become clearer only after Iowa and New Hampshire have voted.
Rubio, the epitome of a young man in a hurry, has taken positions – for example, on the Iran nuclear deal – that have incensed the Senate Republican
leadership.
But they need, and deserve, strong national
leadership
as well.
Regardless of longstanding disagreements over how cross-border freshwater resources should be allocated and managed, and understandable preferences by governments and water professionals to rely on basin agreements rather than on international legal instruments, that half-century wait can be explained only by a lack of political
leadership.
Even if China’s
leadership
wanted to, it could no longer clock its subjects from contact with Western goods, markets, ideas.
As the United States retreats from global leadership, China is expanding its international influence.
At long last, China’s senior
leadership
has endorsed a raft of reforms that could impel the economy’s shift from reliance on exports to consumption-led growth.
The need to navigate this shift raises the toughest question of all: Is the new “fifth-generation” Chinese leadership, headed by President Xi Jinping, up to the challenge?
First, the role of technocrats in China’s senior
leadership
is on the wane.
Finally, Xi’s power base is far broader than that of his two predecessors, Jiang Zemin and Hu Jintao, both of whom had shaky transitions in the first years of their
leadership.
The most important question is this: Will Modi continue to maintain his strategic ambiguity about addressing his own party’s extremist elements, or will he demonstrate true
leadership
by curbing party members’ tirades about core state institutions and exercising greater care in selecting the heads of public institutions?
But Modi’s interventions to calm troubled waters have lacked the
leadership
and passion he demonstrates elsewhere.
The US could provide
leadership
by committing to spending 0.05% of its GDP exploring non-carbon-emitting energy technologies – wind, wave, or solar power – or capturing CO2 emissions from power plants.
This year, the G20, under Germany’s leadership, will focus on building resilience, improving sustainability, and assuming responsibility for climate change – all areas where digitization must be part of the solution.
Likewise, the G7, under Italy’s leadership, will explore how to finance “green” small and medium-size enterprises, taking advantage of fintech-powered innovations.
The Bush administration’s forceful manipulation of Pakistan’s political
leadership
is dangerous for both Pakistan and the US.
So, while loudly proclaiming the unity of the Chinese state, China’s
leadership
is obsessed with the country’s fragility, and works constantly to reduce tensions between its provinces.
Restoring that balance will take time, leadership, a shift in attitudes, and creativity.
Now its economic project lies in tatters while the
leadership
needed to rekindle political integration is nowhere to be seen.
The few announced appointments have won lukewarm nods but no enthusiasm from those looking for bold
leadership.
With Trump now escalating his trade war with China – and with both sides seeming to be girding for protracted competition over technological
leadership
– the threat is only growing.
The World Health Organization, the leading institution charged with protecting global public health, has made very important reforms in the past year under the new
leadership
of Dr. Gro Bruntland, the former Norwegian Prime Minister.
This decision, promoted mainly by the United States, reflects the sad dereliction of U.S.
leadership
evident in so many parts of the world.
It is urgent time for international
leadership
on these issues.
Written under the
leadership
of Sir Nicholas Stern of the London School of Economics, who succeeded me as Chief Economist of the World Bank, the report makes clear that the question is no longer whether we can afford to do anything about global warming, but whether we can afford not to.
In that case, North Korea will gradually become more unstable, despite China’s support, as economic collapse undermines its quasi-legitimate
leadership.
Angela Merkel’s Vision ThingCAMBRIDGE – As Europe struggles to save the euro, the chorus of complaints about weak
leadership
in the world’s major economies grows louder.
Back
Next
Related words
Global
Political
Under
Their
Which
World
Economic
Would
International
Country
About
There
Change
Other
Countries
Could
Power
Years
Should
Strong