Example collocations logo

Investors in sentence

4087 examples of Investors in a sentence

This is one of those excellent short subject films that doesn't seem like either TV episode or someone attempting to get investors to expand it to feature length.
She hires a yacht owner (played by Robert Lansing) to take her potential investors to the proposed building site to see if she can convince them to invest their money in her project.
He invested all the family savings in this project, and expects to have some Japanese investors supporting it.
As long-term interest rates rise, however, share prices will be less attractive to investors and will decline.
Second, the very large projected budget deficits will cause long-term rates to rise in order to induce investors to absorb the increased volume of government debt.
Investors will demand higher yields on bonds to compensate for the resulting loss of purchasing power.
Though the accumulation of substantial short-term debts in the financial system and corporate sector did amplify the shocks, the primary factors fueling the crisis were the lack of international liquidity, panicked behavior by investors, and financial contagion.
To be sure, multinational corporations enjoy flexibility in transfer pricing and can exert pressure at the time they make new investment decisions, but their flexibility doesn’t compare to the freedom enjoyed by international portfolio investors.
That is why Africa’s bloggers and online activists must work more closely with investors and shareholders of communications firms to convince them to stand up for democracy and human rights by resisting illiberal government directives.
But financial markets have a disconcerting habit: predictions viewed by investors as completely obvious often turn out to be wrong.
Investors and consumers did not lose their optimism.
Why did international investors panic in South East Asia?
By the end of 2015, the Yu’e Bao fund manager was overseeing $165 billion in assets and had converted Alipay’s millions of small, financially unsophisticated savers into investors collecting respectable returns.
The law assumes that people who can't find jobs may be able to find investors instead, and that small companies will be able to get the financing they need to grow bigger and hire more people.
Angel investors, friends, and family will boldly go where banks may fear to tread.
Every entrepreneur should be entitled to raise funding from willing investors.
Small (under $1 billion) companies can raise money directly from small investors in a formalization of the “crowdfunding” approach, whereby a project’s principals post their plans on a Web site and ask for money, essentially opening up the initial public offering (IPO) market.
The theory underlying the law is that a new set of accredited third-party marketplaces, rather than the overburdened Securities and Exchange Commission (which missed Bernie Madoff’s monster Ponzi scheme), will ensure that entrepreneurs tell the truth, and that investors know what they are buying.
The banks that originated mortgage loans sold their portfolios to investors who didn't really understand what they were buying.
I wish I had more faith in the system, but the problem is not a lack of good people, good investors, or good entrepreneurs.
Many investors in these startups are likely to lose their money.
Even under the current system, many angel investors lose money.
Mega-disaster risks can be handled with private financial markets, as long as these markets manage to get the full attention and interest of portfolio investors.
Financing for the most expensive projects – implementing green-energy systems, building transport infrastructure, and developing modern cities – must come from foreign institutional investors.
But high-quality private investors are resistant to financing lumpy, illiquid investments in fragile, volatile states.
Investors should take note.
After all this dirt, why aren't more investors voting with their feet?
Investors may respond emotionally, but they are unlikely to let their anger cause them to miss what appears to be a substantive increase in value.
The excessive optimism of the late 1990's lingers, so investors are more impressed by the recent upsurge in corporate earnings--seen as confirming their optimism--than they are by the financial scandals.
Eric Zitzewitz of Stanford University estimates that market timing has cost US mutual fund investors about $5 billion a year--less than 0.1% of the $7 trillion mutual fund assets.
BackNext