Example collocations logo

Investors in sentence

4087 examples of Investors in a sentence

Investors’ decisions would diverge only because of differences in their personal situation.
These people influence markets, because all other investors must reckon with them; and their craziness is not going away anytime soon.
As investors, consumers, voters, and citizens, we must make our voices heard, in order to ensure that finance is used to promote shared values and the common good.
The principles seek to ensure that large-scale land investments result in “win-win” situations, benefiting investors and directly affected communities alike.
It has been several years since private investors and states began buying and leasing millions of hectares of farmland worldwide in order to secure their domestic supply of food, raw commodities, and biofuels, or to get subsidies for carbon storage through plantations.
Western investors, including Wall Street banks and hedge funds, now view direct investments in land as a safe haven in an otherwise turbulent financial climate.
Since 2006, between 15 and 20 million hectares of farmland, the equivalent of the total arable surface of France, have been the subject of negotiations by foreign investors.
There is also a clear tension between ceding land to investors for the creation of large plantations, and the objective of redistributing land and ensuring more equitable access to it.
All this, and currency stabilization, made for an economic boom in Argentina that lasted until 1995, as foreign investors poured money in.
Since Argentina has been in crisis so often, investors always fear the worst and withdraw funds at the first hint of trouble, provoking an even deeper crisis.
A well-functioning market system helps attract high-tech investors from abroad and fosters high-technology startups at home.
On the key issue of being able to issue a “reserve currency” that investors and governments want to hold, Subramanian is correct that China has many of the prerequisites in place.
Against this background, the return of US investors to provide short-term dollar funding for European bank debt smacks of a desperate hunt for yield that relies on European Central Bank President Mario Draghi’s promise to do “whatever it takes” to save the euro.
Investors’ subsequent efforts to price in the risk of a eurozone breakup – not the volume of sovereign debt – caused bond yields to spike.
By bailing out countries in trouble time and again, the IMF allegedly encouraged investors to take unwarranted risks, plowing money into countries without properly assessing whether they could ever pay it back.
Unlike foreign bondholders, who could cut and run after the IMF guaranteed that they would be paid, these direct investors suffered major losses when crisis struck--and thus can hardly be said to have benefited from bailouts.
The hazard struck after 1996, when foreign private investors fled emerging markets even faster than they had flooded them.
The most likely scenario is that investors attributed the steep initial rise in credit flows after 1989 to sound policies in emerging markets.
Ultimately, however, each crisis multiplied the worries of investors about emerging-market risk.
Whether moral hazard or globalization hazard, more careful credit rationing by investors could be expected to reduce the recurrence of financial crises.
Predictably, the West is ramping up its aid, particularly in Myanmar, where the streets of Yangon are now choked with traffic created by aid and government development agencies (and investors).
By guaranteeing to buy shares of a mutual fund, the central bank would provide an incentive for private investors to channel money to the stronger parts of the banking system while allowing the weaker parts to fail.
The Fed’s commitment to buy shares of the mutual fund at a preset price would have caused investors to put new capital into the stronger banks to take advantage of the central bank’s price support.
Finally, by offering to buy shares in a mutual fund of bank stocks, the central bank gives private investors the incentive and the confidence to recapitalize the banking system.
But investors and policymakers don’t believe it yet.
But whether the Fed tries to counteract it by raising interest rates more aggressively than its current forecasts imply, or decides to move cautiously, keeping short-term interest rates well behind the rising curve of price growth, bond investors will suffer.
Looser standards for issuers weaken protection for investors, and there is evidence that lax regulation of new issues may reduce investor demand for them, raising the cost of finance.
The adjustment will be even more painful in Europe, because a sovereign-debt crisis has a depressing effect on everyone – consumers, investors, and the public sector alike.
Investors seem to be taking this view to heart.
Emerging markets were initially tied to this distress only when foreign investors began pulling out their money.
BackNext