Example collocations logo

Integration in sentence

2478 examples of Integration in a sentence

And, from the 1990s on, globalization – in particular, China’s integration into the world economy – has probably been the main reason for the decline in global inflationary pressure.
Now, with the establishment of central regulatory authorities, the EU has moved to the next stage of financial integration.
The report now goes to the European Parliament, which can be expected to push harder for more integration, as it usually does.
So the government held an auction in which domestic vertical integration and value added were not relevant criteria for awarding production rights.
But the process of further European integration has stalled.
However, the Madrid meeting made clear that there is a consensus among these member states in favor of a Europe that can play a key role in our globalized world, and whose actions are based on the principles – effectiveness, transparency, and democracy – that inspire the European integration process.
The death of Havel, a great believer in European integration, is thus highly symbolic: he was one of the last of a now-extinct breed of politicians who could lead effectively in extraordinary times, because their first commitment was to common decency and the common good, not to holding power.
The second shock was EU integration, including the northern and southern enlargements.
Latin America’s Integration MuddleSANTIAGO – Regional integration is usually regarded as a way for countries to strengthen themselves.
But today’s efforts at regional integration in Latin America seem to have a different purpose altogether.
Indeed, none of the current initiatives to boost Latin American regional integration resemble at all the European integration process.
At first glance, the almost constant bombardment of integration proposals in Latin America makes it appear as if the region’s presidents are trying to outdo each other in seeing who can come up with the greatest number of proposals.
According to the Argentine scholar Roberto Bouzas, MERCOSUR is in a critical state of affairs, owing to the inability of its institutions to maintain “the common objectives which drove its member states to engage in the process of regional integration and the consequent loss of focus and capacity to prioritize underlying political problems.
While the Unasur proposal may have been formulated in a more rigorous way than other initiatives, its failure to contemplate trade integration means that there is nothing to tie member states together beyond political will.
Although Unasur aims to progress beyond free-trade agreements, this requires a more streamlined integration within the organization – one that expands its current role as a forum for discussing problems and seeking solutions for Latin America as a whole.
Although the inclusion of all Latin American states goes some way towards repairing the weakened Brazilian-Mexican axis, and creates a new and more positive environment for future political coordination, this new organization is unlikely to contribute much to actual regional integration.
It seems that Latin America has abandoned the principles, commitments, and foundations of full regional integration.
The deal on the core nuclear issues is central to this approach, but so is a credible process for developing the trade and investment links that will facilitate Iran’s move from isolation to integration.
Continental Europe did not deregulate as much, and preferred to seek growth in greater economic integration.
Indeed, cooperation in the international war on terrorism, the recent agreement to reduce stockpiles of nuclear weapons, and Russia's rapprochement with NATO appear to be only the beginning of a process that is deepening by the day Russia's integration with the West.
Europeans are experiencing an unprecedented period of peace and prosperity; their integration model has now spread to include most of the continent.
Closer integration with the EU is therefore widely seen as important to the success of Russia’s own economic transformation.
But model of integration followed from the 1990’s up until about 2005 was not a success.
To work, integration must be balanced and equal, with both Russia and the EU adopting some of each other’s ideas.
By contrast, the East generally embraced the fearful view that, as the Chilean sociologist Oswaldo Sunkel put it, integration into the international economy would lead to disintegration of the national economy.
The French rejected the European Union constitution, primarily – or so it appears – because further European integration, it is feared, must bring in its wake the huge costs and disruptions of neo-liberalism.
Europe cannot afford a dogfight between these two founding member states, so it’s high time to put emotions aside and review their differences on the future course of European integration.
Polls show that more than 80% of Belgians want yet more integration, whereas roughly 50% of the Dutch describing themselves as Euroskeptics.
The two countries also found themselves in opposing camps over the war in Iraq, and, of course, in their attitudes about further political integration.
The Netherlands’ current reserved stance on further political integration is not in its broader interest.
BackNext