Example collocations logo

Innovation in sentence

3014 examples of Innovation in a sentence

But, globally, our innovation system needs much bigger changes.
Reforming our innovation system is not just a matter of economics.
Though no country has ever practiced risk management on such a massive scale, it is important to consider such an innovation now.
But disasters and economic crises can have a silver lining if they spur fundamental innovation by forcing us to think about how to manage risks in the future.
The world’s economies, rich and poor alike, have much to gain from accelerated innovation in the information age.
Top incomes in these countries have resulted largely from political patronage, rather than from innovation and hard work.
In New Zealand, the abolition of subsidies in 1984 helped to catalyze innovation and diversification in the agricultural sector, which today drives New Zealand’s economic growth.
By de-risking the economic lives of citizens, this social contract stifles entrepreneurship and innovation.
One major reason is that MENA governments fail to encourage – and, in some cases, actively discourage – innovation.
But, in order to ensure quality growth, the country must continue working to boost private business, expand equity financing, and advance decentralization, thereby spurring competition, innovation, and job creation.
Regional economies would benefit from the same networks of high-paying research jobs, entrepreneurs, investors, and service providers that traditional life-sciences innovation hubs create.
With these in place, African countries can marshal additional resources for infrastructure, innovation, expertise, and new technologies.
Rarely is science in a position to help manage an innovation long before the consequences of that innovation are available for study.
The beauty of the precautionary principle lies not only in its grounding in international public law, but also in its track record as a framework for managing innovation in myriad scientific contexts.
Financial innovation will proceed along with regulatory arbitrage.
Such policies, however, would undermine innovation and productivity growth, the primary force behind rising living standards.
The agency will also maintain two vital arms in Europe: an innovation and technology center in Bonn; and an office in Vienna for strategic alliances with other agencies, particularly the United Nations.
Renewable energy costs will eventually go down, in step with technological innovation and mass production.
This is a far-reaching innovation.
After all, without unforeseen change, much of human endeavor would be fruitless, and innovation would be unnecessary.
As we argued in this year’s Gates Foundation Goalkeepers Report, better health care and education – two pillars of the World Bank’s “human capital index” – can unlock productivity and innovation, reduce poverty, and generate prosperity.
If we coordinate our investments in people with our spending on innovation, the new “digital age” will leave no one behind.
More resources are being committed, the corporate sector is being encouraged to get involved, and there is a welcome emphasis on innovation.
Europe needs such an approach, one that includes microeconomic adjustments and programs that encourage mobility, flexibility, and innovation.
Without fundamental change, China faces slower economic growth, inadequate job creation and innovation, and popping bubbles.
Such collaboration is already happening in places like the Philippines, where a National eHealth Steering Committee oversees a suite of digital-health initiatives, thus creating an ideal environment for digital innovation.
Moreover, in order to drive Europe’s transformation into a hub of responsible innovation and ethically sound production, policymakers must ensure that higher-education institutions equip students with cutting-edge knowledge and high-level flexible skills grounded in shared values.
This includes not only financial deregulation, but also central bank independence, the separation of monetary and fiscal policies, and the assumption that competitive markets require no government intervention to produce an acceptable income distribution, drive innovation, provide necessary infrastructure, and deliver public goods.
Governments could invest much more in infrastructure and innovation at zero cost.
But they also need to do much more to promote innovation and competitiveness.
BackNext