Example collocations logo

Innovation in sentence

3014 examples of Innovation in a sentence

That EU embraces globalization and innovation, while also protecting Europeans, doing more to help them adapt to a changing world.
Macron combined big ideas with many concrete proposals for closer cooperation on defense, migration, the environment, innovation, education, and much else.
The reason is straightforward: financial innovation is difficult.
This would include coordinated monetary and fiscal policies across the G20 countries; renewed efforts to expand world trade; new national agendas addressing inequality and promoting social mobility; and a laser-like focus on science, technology, and innovation as the key to future growth.
As economies open up, as countries do what they do best, competition and innovation drive up rates of growth.
Having more open economies allows more trade in innovation, so that new companies can almost instantly use smart ideas from around the globe.
Many companies have already redoubled their efforts to increase their value-added and innovation capacity.
It has a free press and an open society; it welcomes migrants and refugees; it has a thirst for new ideas and a knack for innovation.
More democratic regimes were, consequently, rather suspicious of the political implications of institutional innovation.
To be sure, progress in any field, from commerce and communications to health and environmental science, will become increasingly dependent on technological innovation, and thus on the high-order skills – acquired through intensive technical training – that drive it.
Moreover, in a recent innovation, the Fed now publishes the inflation and interest-rate forecasts of FOMC members and Reserve Bank presidents.
There is more room for innovation in education than in any other international-development sector, especially as digital technologies and the Internet become more accessible even in the world’s poorest regions.
It is this free-market economy, which rewards useful innovation and purposeful risk-taking, that we should honor and recognize.
What the Dragon moment makes clear is that the ability to commercialize innovation, not just to create it, is what has made the US economy so robust over the long run.
Because of this fragility, few countries have been able to establish highly productive scientific enterprises, even though scientific innovation and technological breakthroughs are crucial to a country’s productivity, economic growth, and influence.
Deregulation increased the opportunities for innovation and trading, and for profit.
But this is at odds with the view, prevailing in Silicon Valley and other global technology hubs, that we are entering a new golden era of innovation, which will radically increase productivity growth and improve the way we live and work.
But if this were true, one would need to argue that the mis-measure of productivity growth is more severe today than in past decades of technological innovation.
A third explanation is that there is always a lag between innovation and productivity growth.
First, if workers remain unemployed for too long, they lose their skills and human capital; second, because technological innovation is embedded in new capital goods, low investment leads to permanently lower productivity growth.
Up to now, there has been too much emphasis on institutional design, and not enough on social dynamism and innovation.
The problem is that economists (and those who listen to them) became over-confident in their preferred models of the moment: markets are efficient, financial innovation transfers risk to those best able to bear it, self-regulation works best, and government intervention is ineffective and harmful.
With more than 995 million mobile subscribers, Africa’s increasing connectivity is being used to power innovation.
The region lags far behind its middle-income counterparts in science, math, technology innovation, entrepreneurship, small business development, and (therefore) job creation.
Second, in the debate about fiscal consolidation and structural reform, Western economies have not yet achieved the right balance of deficit reduction, incentives for innovation, and macroeconomic stimulus, but there are signs of change coming from Brussels.
These obstacles could include excessive taxation or regulation, both of which can discourage work, innovation, saving, and investment.
In formulating such policies – whether through legislation, regulatory rule-setting, international agreements, or measures addressing related issues such as tax and trade – the goal should be to limit the downsides of technology without stifling innovation.
Kadima’s success is due to Sharon’s main innovation in Israeli politics: the successful unilateral disengagement from Gaza.
In order to accelerate the pace of energy-related innovation, creative coalitions among governments, private firms, and civil-society groups should be established in three main areas.
Together with increased cooperation on technological innovation and an agreed set of policy principles that can be translated into concurrent national measures, this would boost growth in markets for energy-efficient and renewable technologies, driving costs down further.
BackNext