Infrastructure
in sentence
4036 examples of Infrastructure in a sentence
Another reason for optimism about the US and world economies is rooted in the Trump administration’s $1 trillion plan to rebuild America’s
infrastructure.
With two business advisory councils having been disbanded in the wake of the Charlottesville incident, following an exodus of CEOs critical of Trump’s response, plans for an
infrastructure
advisory council have now also been dropped.
The challenge for Russia’s leaders is to use its oil wealth to educate Russia’s people and rebuild Russia’s infrastructure, thereby ensuring global competitiveness and employment growth.
Moreover, unlike the “Empowerment Zones” introduced by the Clinton administration in 1994, the OZ program does not include grants, loan guarantees, and other fiscal tools to finance investments in training, infrastructure, affordable housing, and local services.
As other states and territories do the same, they should keep an eye on key factors such as child-poverty rates, the quality of education and training opportunities, and
infrastructure
and transportation conditions that affect local economic development.
Most of these countries have very small financial systems relative to the size of their economies, and, with small and medium-size enterprises (SMEs), households, and
infrastructure
projects facing credit constraints, they certainly have ample room for sustainable market deepening.
Most countries have the basic market
infrastructure
and regulations, but enforcement and supervision is often weak.
It is true that not all debt is created equal, and there is a strong case for adding more of it if the purpose is to finance highly productive
infrastructure
investments.
By the second half of the year, the investment bust in real estate, infrastructure, and industrial capacity will accelerate.
Viewed in this way, an essential policy that developed and developing countries should pursue in overcoming the crisis is to build
infrastructure
suitable for the twenty-first century.
As access to international bank loans, bond flotations, and foreign direct investment is lost,
infrastructure
projects talked about in the past are now being shelved, threatening the political and economic stability of dozens of developing countries.
In fact, every part of the world has a huge backlog of vital
infrastructure
investments.
Most
infrastructure
investment requires public-sector leadership to forge partnerships with the private sector.
Typically, the public sector must enter into contractual agreements with private firms not only to build the infrastructure, but also to operate it as a regulated monopoly or on a concession basis.
Governments should thus strengthen their ministries of
infrastructure
(including power, roads, water and sanitation, and information and communication technologies), as well as their national development banks, so that they can properly design long-term
infrastructure
projects and programs.
Whereas most of the “stimulus” legislation to date has been short-term and inward-looking, increased funding for sustainable
infrastructure
in poor countries would provide a powerful boost to rich-world economies.
It can also be done multilaterally, by raising the
infrastructure
investment flows from the World Bank and the regional development banks (including the Inter-American Development Bank, European Investment Bank, African Development Bank, and Asian Development Bank).
Developed countries also fail to recognize that without much greater financing of sustainable
infrastructure
in the developing world – especially sustainable power generation and transmission – a global agreement on climate change later this year (or any time soon) will be impossible.
Israel is determined not to act against terrorist groups and
infrastructure
on Egypt’s territory.
Such a policy response would have to include pro-growth structural reforms (such as higher
infrastructure
investment, a tax overhaul, and labor retooling), more responsive fiscal policy, relief for pockets of excessive indebtedness, and improved global coordination.
Regardless of how one chooses to measure innovation, three conditions must be in place for it to flourish: a skilled, educated workforce; excellent information and communications technology infrastructure; and a supportive business environment.
The
infrastructure
imperative does not end with housing, either.
Investment accelerated, and major
infrastructure
projects were realized.
And the benefits – including a safer climate, smarter infrastructure, better vehicles, and cleaner air – would be massive.
That is why quantitative easing should be run in conjunction with a eurozone-wide investment program designed to modernize the creaking
infrastructure
of eastern and southern Europe.
The reality is that limiting fossil-fuel production today is essential to avoid continued entrenchment of energy
infrastructure
and political dynamics that will make shifting away from fossil fuels later more difficult and expensive.
But the real work is yet to come, with countries not only canceling plans for new fossil-fuel infrastructure, but also winding down existing systems.
If we build it purposefully, we can address issues of equity and human rights, ensuring that the transition is fair and smooth, and that new energy
infrastructure
is ecologically sound and democratically controlled.
Yet overregulation, heavy bureaucratic burdens, policy uncertainty, poor digital and transport infrastructure, and, in some industries, a lack of skilled workers, are currently impeding investment by companies in new and existing capacity.
And it should invest in developing an internationally competitive digital
infrastructure
and a social security system that ensures labor-force participation and lowers long-term unemployment.
Back
Next
Related words
Investment
Projects
Countries
Public
Growth
Which
Education
Development
Would
Their
Economic
Investments
Other
Spending
Energy
Government
Should
Health
Including
Capital