Example collocations logo

Infrastructure in sentence

4036 examples of Infrastructure in a sentence

The export portion increased the most – by nearly six-fold, from 6% in 1980 to a pre-crisis peak of 35% in 2007 – as new capacity and infrastructure, low-cost labor, and accession to the World Trade Organization made China the world’s greatest beneficiary of accelerating globalization and surging trade flows.
Moreover, claims that the Saudi coalition has intentionally targeted civilians – or infrastructure, for that matter – have not been substantiated by neutral parties.
Similarly, the United States needs more productivity-enhancing infrastructure – roads, bridges, and ports – and not frills such as high-speed trains between Sacramento and San Diego.
But putting in place an effective regulatory and enforcement infrastructure can be equally important, especially in areas where consumers have difficulty assessing the value of products and the risks they can pose.
The world’s richer countries created their regulatory infrastructure over generations, during a time when there was little direct global competition.
And yet, despite their potential, African SMEs are subject to significant internal and external pressures, including poor infrastructure, high labor costs, deficient governance, and a dearth of skilled workers.
African governments should pursue intra-regional trade liberalization, institutional integration, and infrastructure development with greater determination than ever.
Second, the White House must not only get the pending free trade agreements ratified by Congress, but should improve them, learning from the NAFTA experience, make them more poverty-sensitive, more environmentally- and labor-oriented, and provide more support for infrastructure and training.
Is it supporting real development needs, such as growing more food, fighting disease, or building transport, energy, and communications infrastructure?
Another option would be to increase public spending in military procurement and infrastructure, though military procurement is a long-term process, and more infrastructure investment would be difficult at a time when the construction industry is running at full capacity.
Already struggling with low gas prices, increased competition, and now falling production Gazprom will be hard pressed to come up with the necessary funds without sacrificing urgent infrastructure projects.
Additional losses could be billed for the Russian-supported war in southeast Ukraine, which has led to 6,000 deaths and large-scale damage to infrastructure.
At this stage, there is no consensus on such basic issues as personal-data ownership, infrastructure security, and new disruptive businesses’ rights and responsibilities.
As a recent report released by the Global Commission on the Economy and Climate emphasizes, that approach should center on investment in sustainable infrastructure.
There is no question that the investments made today in infrastructure, as well as in extraction and utilities – will have important implications for long-term emissions.
Green infrastructure, however, can form the foundation for a sustainable economy.
The Global Commission report sets out to identify the main obstacles to financing such infrastructure and to create an agenda to overcome them.
Little progress was made in developing traditional energy infrastructure linking markets.
For starters, available energy infrastructure must be fully employed.
But building the infrastructure is just the first step; now we must ensure that it is serving consumers’ needs and interests.
The US Department of Defense put up tens of billions of dollars in contracts for microelectronics, a commitment that both paid down innovators’ risk and created an infrastructure that would support the growth of start-ups.
To be sure, Africa owes its lack of industrialization more to structural factors such as unfavorable investment climates, insufficient infrastructure, and wayward industrial policies.
Of the 30 Latin American countries included in this year’s report, only one-third have lower HDI rankings than GDP rankings, and only a few – those with the region’s greatest need for significant improvements in social infrastructure, particularly provision of health and education – show large discrepancies.
Reforms targeting labor policy, the investment climate, social insurance, competition, education, and infrastructure created a more inclusive and more sustainable growth model by spreading purchasing power, which supported aggregate demand and reduced vulnerability to investment-driven booms and busts.
These include educational opportunity and performance, the relationship between productivity and wage growth, the concentration of economic rents, the effectiveness of the financial system’s intermediation of investment in the real economy, physical and digital infrastructure, and the coverage and adequacy of basic social protections.
Liberals and social democrats supported a private-ownership economy, markets, European integration, and increased trade, tempered by substantially redistributive taxes and transfers, a strong social safety net, and some public ownership in areas such as infrastructure and finance.
A Marshall Plan for the United StatesNEW YORK – When a major highway bridge in California collapsed last month, the impact on the entire southwestern United States once again highlighted the country’s serious infrastructure problem.
If the US does not act quickly to provide its fragile economic recovery with a solid foundation of modern infrastructure, it could find itself sinking slowly back into stagnation.
But the state of infrastructure in the US suggests that many decision-makers do not share this view.
The report concludes that a $3.6 trillion investment (roughly one-fifth of the country’s annual GDP) will be needed by 2020 to boost the quality of US infrastructure by addressing the “significant backlog of overdue maintenance [and the] pressing need for modernization.”
BackNext