Example collocations logo

Industries in sentence

1758 examples of Industries in a sentence

Other presidential appointees exert considerable influence on firms, industries, or the entire economy.
With respect to economic interests, all governments look for ways to help their countries’ own industries, whether through regulation, subsidies, or trade barriers.
Low-cost steel (provided at prices below the long-term average cost of production but at or above the marginal cost) may be a distinct advantage for other industries.
Direct employment in exporting industries does not play a significant role in the US labor market.
Ensuring that the EU does not face the same tariffs as China is particularly significant, because European suppliers are Chinese exporters’ main competitors in many industries.
In Paris, CEOs from various industries – ranging from cement to technology companies – made clear pledges to decrease carbon footprints, invest in renewables, and manage resources sustainably.
There will also be more emphasis on expanding service industries and less on manufacturing.
These two Mexicos are pulling in opposite directions, which explains why three decades of reforms to open markets, privatize industries, embrace free trade, and welcome foreign investment have failed to raise growth rates.
This massive transition will transform how citizens interact with their governments, revolutionize entire industries, and change the way we engage with one another.
Some are even opting to divest from any company with exposure to industries or business practices that present sustainability challenges.
Setting the standards that will govern autonomous vehicles and related technologies is far more important than protecting old industries.
The problem in China is not the volume of state-owned assets, but their concentration in a few companies and industries – a situation that poses risks to economic performance.
It thinks it is essential to locate refineries, industries, and additional energy-generating units in parts of the country that are both suited for such development and in need of it.
This shift would seem to favor the advanced economies, whose industries are at the frontier in employing digital technologies in their products and operations.
Twenty-first-century globalization, driven by digitization and rapid changes in competitive advantage, can disrupt local industries, companies, and communities and cause job loss, even as it spurs greater productivity, boosts overall employment, and generates economy-wide gains.
Most public-sector industries have been near bankruptcy until saved by competition and privatization.
Technologies like cloud computing, artificial intelligence, autonomous systems, and “smart devices” are spawning new industries, and revolutionizing old ones.
China, for example, has established its own digital industries, using policies such as Internet filtering, data localization (requiring Internet firms to store data on domestic servers), and forced technology transfer to drive digital development.
The election of President Donald Trump in the US, who campaigned on a platform of protectionist trade rules and support for “traditional” manufacturing industries, has called into question the future of digital rulemaking.
All are examples of fast-moving industries in which competition is fierce and great wealth is created.
Industries and firms, like people, have their own life cycles, and the pace of change in high-tech industries is unprecedented.
However, if we distinguish between the industries that produce information and communications technologies (ICT) and those that are simply users of such technologies, we can see that the productivity growth gap stems almost entirely from the weakness of Europe's ICT producing sector.
Cell phones, satellite tracking, and high-resolution cameras are not cheap to come by, but happily for the industries that use them, costs for their development have been partly picked up by the government.
This is why the suicides are most prevalent in the cotton belt on which the seed industries’ claim is rapidly becoming a stranglehold.
And it has disrupted some economic sectors, forced changes to long-established business models, and created a few entirely new industries.
This policy rationale was underscored by his warning that America “cannot cede to other nations the technology that will power new jobs and new industries.”
Second, the world’s industrial core must create incentives for its energy industries to undertake the investments in new technologies that will move us by mid-century to an economic structure that is light on carbon emissions and heavy on carbon sequestration.
By connecting Japan’s industries more closely with those of other countries, the TPP can accelerate this process considerably.
NSE treats modern economic development as a process of continuous structural change in technologies, industries, and hard and soft infrastructure – all of which increases labor productivity, and thus per capita income.
As labor costs in China rise, labor-intensive industries are relocating to lower-wage developing countries, providing millions of job opportunities.
BackNext