Example collocations logo

Implementation in sentence

774 examples of Implementation in a sentence

In short, implementation of fiscal, financial, and structural reforms can mitigate the spillover effects from China’s slowdown.
The implementation of the WHO's strategy could lead to one of the largest-ever positive shifts in human health, putting populations throughout the world on pathways to lifelong and sustained improvements in well-being.
They also demand that the interests of big landowners in the agreed rural reform be safeguarded, and argue that implementation of the agreement should be subordinate to the government’s fiscal constraints.
The Bush administration’s overconfidence in the validity of its objectives – democratizing the Middle East – much more than implementation failures, was the key factor behind the unfolding catastrophe there.
The elimination of fossil-fuel subsidies and the implementation of carbon pricing are particularly important; with oil prices very low, now is the ideal time for countries to implement such reforms.
Meanwhile, in India, the implementation of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s ambitious reform agenda has been slower than anticipated.
Its successful implementation will require bold policies and strengthened global cooperation that address both the impact of inclusion and its underlying causes.
But, if the framework is to be consensual, its implementation should not be based at an institution that is too closely associated with one side of the market or the other.
The IRA commitment to decommission weapons by May 2000 is contingent on the overall implementation of the Belfast Agreement, including demilitarisation by the British army; radical reform of the Royal Ulster Constabulary (the province’s armed police force); effectively functioning devolved administration and cross-border bodies; prisoner releases, equality and cultural reforms.
Of course, the EU countries could leave Greece to the mercy of the International Monetary Fund, which is willing and able to help – conditional on the government’s implementation of a strict austerity program.
Only then can one hope for full implementation of reforms and the virtuous circle of improved expectations and economic performance that should have been set in motion by the European Council’s Lisbon summit seven years ago.
They include the conclusion of the US-Russia new START treaty, which would reduce deployed strategic weapons; some modest limitations on the role of nuclear weapons in US nuclear doctrine; a Washington summit that reached useful agreement on the implementation of improved nuclear-security measures; and hard-to-achieve consensus at the recently concluded pentannual Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) Review Conference on useful steps forward, including a 2012 conference on achieving a nuclear-weapons-free zone in the Middle East.
As a result, it is profoundly difficult to develop policies that enjoy support at every excruciating phase of their implementation.
Implementation of the common EU position on arms exports has led to more exchanges of information, greater transparency, and closer consultation.
The main expectations are for a reduction of nuclear armaments, a cutback in the number of launch-ready warheads (de-alerting), negotiations on a Fissile Materials Cut-off Treaty, ratification of the Comprehensive Test-Ban Treaty, and other means of strengthening practical implementation of the Non-Proliferation Treaty, especially its universal adoption.
Although Brazil boasts effective tax collection and its central bank has a reputation for prudent monetary policy, fiscal resources are squandered on social programs and on constitutionally mandated expenditures that produce low returns, owing to poor public-sector implementation.
Success in all of these areas depends on effective implementation, monitoring, and cooperation between government and business.
As with business, education, and much else in life, most of what makes foreign policy work – or not – is a matter of implementation and execution.
At some point, the implementation challenge will include additional measures to ensure that Iran does not develop nuclear weapons once the agreement’s time limits on specified programs expire.
A second reality is that there is an unavoidable trade-off between negotiations and implementation.
But such “creative ambiguity” also ensures that the implementation phase will be more difficult, as tough choices that were postponed suddenly must be addressed.
Fourth, while all this has been happening, the institutions set up after World War II to create global rules and to preside over their implementation have lost much of their political and economic sway and legitimacy.
Markets will remain skeptical, especially if implementation leads to street demonstrations, riots, strikes, and parliamentary foot-dragging.
And REDD implementation through experimental projects provides advocates of this approach a solid foundation on which to advance their agenda.
El Salvador’s experience was instrumental in showing the dangers of a lack of collaboration between the United Nations, which supported the implementation of the peace agreement, and the Bretton Woods institutions (the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank), which supported the program for reactivating the economy.
Properly executed infrastructure investment entails more than just financing; it also requires that all the myriad details of a project’s selection, design, and implementation be closely managed.
And policymakers in advanced economies should preserve and apply well-known checks and balances, to keep the project-selection playing field level, and to permit monitoring implementation from start to finish.
In the Democratic-controlled “blue” states, where 60% of the US population lives – and which account for 70% of national income and 80% of its wealth – implementation of the ACA is likely to be like that of RomneyCare in Massachusetts: a somewhat bumpy ride, but a clear success that nobody will wish to repeal after the fact.
British business lobbies, as well as the government officials tasked with implementation, have been pressing for this transition period to be as long as possible.
Indeed, the aspiration to maintain market control explains OPEC’s opposition to the Kyoto Protocol, whose implementation might reduce global oil demand by as much as 20%, and its fear that the US might follow Europe’s example and fight oil addiction by a drastic increase in energy taxes.
Back