Households
in sentence
1591 examples of Households in a sentence
Given that affluent
households
spend a smaller share of their incomes and wealth, greater inequality translates into lower overall consumption, thereby hindering the recovery of economies already burdened by inadequate aggregate demand.
To the extent that tolerance of above-target inflation also reflects a desire to erode the real value of public and private debts, market interest rates could soar, leaving indebted governments and
households
in even greater trouble.
The latter is a crucial in any policy, since one of the single most important causes of poverty in the US is the diffusion of single parents (read single mother)
households
in the black community.
This led to excessive debt creation, financial crisis, and now a chronic aggregate-demand shortfall, with households, companies, and governments all seeking to reduce their debt.
Market forces will also benefit from the growth in households’ spending power.
The tax package is primarily about redistribution from middle-income
households
– particularly those in high-tax, Democratic-leaning states such as New York and California – to the richest Americans.
In Nigeria, for example, urban boys from the wealthiest 20% of
households
average ten years of schooling, while poor rural girls in northern areas can expect less than two years.
Such a policy would save
households
in these countries over $700 million (2015 US dollars) a year, with poor
households
gaining disproportionately more than rich ones.
This shift will require a big increase in local purchasing power – and, therefore, an enormous transfer of wealth from large domestic companies to Chinese
households.
In 2001, South Africa introduced a “Free Basic Water Policy,” according to which all households, regardless of size or income, receive six kiloliters (1,585 gallons) of water per month at no cost.
Those revenues could then be used to improve health services and strengthen the social safety net, thereby removing the need for Chinese
households
to maintain high precautionary savings.
Despite income growth,
households
are reluctant to consume and build; and, despite a surge in profits, companies are not inclined to take risks and invest.
Finally, unemployment in parts of the eurozone remains too high for
households
to regain confidence, while the fiscal stance is not distributed across countries in a way that maximizes growth prospects.
Because
households
would spend part of the windfall, a helicopter drop would boost both domestic demand and the price level.
It is true that a helicopter drop would be functionally equivalent to a direct government transfer to households, financed by central banks’ permanent issuance of money.
For households, which must burn firewood, cow dung, and kerosene to cook, it means indoor air pollution that can cause respiratory disease.
As a result, the net worth of
households
increased by $10 trillion that year.
A further motive of the ECB’s bond purchases has been to increase the cash that eurozone banks have available to lend to businesses and
households.
Since their collapse in 2007, US
households
have understandably become fixated on repairing the damage.
Indeed, balance-sheet repair has barely begun for US
households.
Just as two previous rounds of quantitative easing failed to accelerate US households’ balance-sheet repair, there is little reason to believe that “QE3” will do the trick.
Equally serious, it contributes to shocking levels of income inequality, with a few
households
not only enjoying massive wealth, but also wielding considerable political influence.
The fashion today is to integrate poor
households
into flourishing communities.
When both bubbles burst, over-extended US
households
had no choice but to cut back and rebuild their damaged balance sheets by paying down outsize debt burdens and rebuilding depleted savings.
While misguided Washington policymakers would like nothing better than for consumers to return to their old risky ways and start spending again, over-extended American
households
now know better.
This could take a number of forms: quantitative easing combined with fiscal expansion (for example, higher infrastructure spending), direct cash transfers to the government, or, most radically, direct cash transfers to
households.
In general, deleveraging by households, governments, and financial institutions should be gradual – and supported by currency weakening – if we are to avoid a double-dip recession and a worsening of deflation.
Sealing itself off from the bracing effects of global competition is sapping Brazil of much-needed momentum, with serious consequences for households, most of which have experienced only modest income growth in recent years.
The government has recently used its regulatory power to push down rates for both
households
and firms.
All eyes are on
households.
Back
Next
Related words
Their
Income
Which
Would
Firms
Businesses
Financial
Spending
Consumption
Rates
Countries
Banks
Economic
Governments
Government
Growth
Companies
Savings
Prices
While