Historical
in sentence
2205 examples of Historical in a sentence
It makes good arguments--the gap between Jesus' theoretical life and the writing of the Gospels, filled only by the writings of Paul, who doesn't indicate a
historical
Jesus--and then utterly fails to convincingly argue them.
I have rarely been subjected to such outright nonsense in a film that is supposed to be based on a
historical
figure.
She could have just told the truth - the truth as presented in the film, not necessarily the
historical
truth - and her lover would have been spared time in jail for a rape he did not commit.
Historical
and technical inaccuracies abound.
He sites profane literature (writings from the same time period but not connected with the bible) a number of times however I can think of at least three references off the top of my head which lend
historical
accuracy to events contained in the bible.
Nor is it a
historical
drama.
It moves like molasses, the acting for the most part is either over-the-top ham or under-the-top comatose--although Raul Julia comes off better than most of the rest of the cast--and it's chock full of annoying
historical
inaccuracies.
What I didn't need was the naive love non-affair, the unrealistically silly war scenes and the abuse of the syrupy soundtrack in a film which avoided carefully all
historical
or political references (Stalinism, Nazism, Holocaust) only to end on a passing but nonetheless insulting to our sense of history endnote about "liberating Poland".
Nothing much to say other than how thoroughly appalled I was at what a blatant piece of American
historical
revisionist propaganda it is; and starring Susan Sarandon of all people!
The result is a well-meaning short which has little relevance or entertainment value today other than as an
historical
artefact.
Miriam Hopkins plays a murky character named "Julia Hayne", obviously a
historical
lunge at the town's first lady, Julia Bulette, who in real life a celebrated prostitute.
Everyone is Napoleon or some other
historical
figure; or they have a fascination with chickens.
I found this a good movie to pass your time, but not by any chance of any
historical
value.
Forget
historical
reality too.
The fact that I did not like the music is a very personal opinion, the
historical
innacuracies are not.
Its an interesting
historical
piece for us locals.
"Robin Hood - Prince of thieves" seems a masterpiece of
historical
accuracy in comparison.And at least Alan Rickman was funny.
This movie was promising: my favorite actor in a
historical
drama during the Independence war.
"Historical
fiction" does not justify changing history.
Making up a fake
historical
actor and crediting this fiction with exposing Amin to the world is irresponsible, lazy and stupid.
This movie was disjointed...it gave no background about his life, no
historical
context, and nothing about his great writings (except a brief, passing reference to "The Cost of Discipleship" by a colleague at the beginning of the movie.)
Since most review's of this film are of screening's seen decade's ago I'd like to add a more recent one, the film open's with stock footage of B-17's bombing Germany, the film cut's to Oskar Werner's Hauptmann (captain) Wust character and his aide running for cover while making their way to Hitler's Fuehrer Bunker, once inside, they are debriefed by bunker staff personnel, the film then cut's to one of many conference scene's with Albin Skoda giving a decent impression of Adolf Hitler rallying his officer's to "Ultimate Victory" while Werner's character is shown as slowly coming to realize the bunker denizen's are caught up in a fantasy world-some non-bunker event's are depicted, most notable being the flooding of the subway system to prevent a Russian advance through them and a minor subplot involving a young member of the Flak unit's and his family's difficulty in surviving-this film suffer's from a number of detail inaccuracies that a German film made only 10 year's after WW2 should not have included; the actor portraying Goebbels (Willy Krause) wear's the same uniform as Hitler, including arm eagle- Goebbels wore a brown Nazi Party uniform with swastika armband-the "SS" soldier's wear German army camouflage, the well documented scene of Hitler awarding the iron cross to boy's of the Hitler Youth is shown as having taken place INSIDE the bunker (it was done outside in the courtyard) and lastly, Hitler's suicide weapon is clearly shown as a Belgian browning model 1922-most account's agree it was a Walther PPK-some bit's of acting also seem wholly inaccurate with the drunken dance scene near the end of the film being notable, this bit is shown as a cabaret skit, with a intoxicated wounded soldier (his arm in a splint) maniacally goose-stepping to music while a nurse does a combination striptease/belly dance, all by candlelight... this is actually embarrassing to watch-the most incredible bit is when Werner's Captain Wust gain's an audience alone with Skoda's Hitler, Hitler is shown as slumped on a wall bench, drugged and delirious, when Werner's character begin's to question him, Hitler start's screaming which bring's in a SS guard who mortally wound's Werner's character in the back with a gunshot-this fabricated scene is not based on any true historic account-Werner's character is then hauled off to die in a anteroom while Hitler prepare's his own ending, Hitler's farewell to his staff is shown but the suicide is off-screen, the final second's of the movie show Hitler's funeral pyre smoke slowly forming into a ghostly image of the face of the dead Oskar Werner/Hauptmann Wust-this film is more allegorical than
historical
and anyone interested in this period would do better to check out more recent film's such as the 1973 remake "Hitler: the last 10 day's" or the German film "Downfall" (Der Untergang) if they wish a more true accounting of this dramatic story, these last two film's are based on first person eyewitness account's, with "Hitler: the last 10 day's" being compiled from Gerhard Boldt's autobiography as a staff officer in the Fuehrer Bunker and "Downfall" being done from Hitler's secretary's recollection's, the screen play for "Der Letzte Akte" is taken from American Nuremberg war crime's trial judge Michael Musmanno's book "Ten day's to die", which is more a compilation of event's (many obviously fanciful) than eyewitness history-it is surprising that Hugh Trevor Roper's account,"The last day's of Hitler" was never made into a film.
The
historical
inaccuracies of the film are not as gross and offensive as in "U-571" (which changes British submariners to American ones) but you still walk away feeling a little slimy.
I gave this a four purely out of its
historical
context.
the costumes, the dialog,
historical
accuracy are terrible.
The
historical
aspect of the story is glazed over and the ending left me a bit cold.
If there is ever an
historical
marker which indicates the superficiality and shallowness of an era, Myra Breckinridge provides that marker.
That's all very well, but just because Ned Kelly is an important Australian
historical
icon DOESN'T MAKE THE MOVIE GOOD.
Pearl Harbor was about a very important
historical
event to Americans, but that doesn't mean I'm going to defend the movie and say it was good, because it was still bad.
More than any other film, this one brings a human face to the
historical
drama of early twentieth century "progress."
Back
Next
Related words
Which
Their
There
About
Political
Movie
Economic
Would
Countries
Other
History
Experience
Story
World
Should
People
Cultural
Between
While
Years