Historical
in sentence
2205 examples of Historical in a sentence
an excellent, thoughtfully produced
historical
drama--well played, artfully written, shot in ways that convey accurate visual images of the congo, and with more than a few moving moments, especially for those who care about the history of Africa and imperialism.
if you have the DVD version, there is also some useful
historical
background.
It's worth noting that audiences of the time were no more naive about the story than we are today; the NY Times review conceded that audiences would "dismiss factual inaccuracies sprinkled throughout the film," described the biographical account of Custer's life as "fanciful," and pointed out that the presentation of Custer's motivations regarding the final events were at odds with various
historical
accounts.
Historical
drama is one of the areas where the British just can't be beat.
The "human issues" are presented not so much through the characters here, but through the
historical
reality that was gripping those who had survived Hitler -- both conquered and victors.
Obviously, whenever you want to produce a story such as this one, focusing on African American
historical
involvement (and NO, servants and 'mammies' are not
historical
involvement), Hollywood isn't going to be too supportive.
The
historical
atmosphere, the young girl looking for love, the amazing background of music hall and the voyage into the lesbian world of London early twentieth century make this an exceptional movie.
It almost seemed as though the filmmakers couldn't make up their minds about whether the movie was supposed to be a martial arts "flick" or a
historical
epic.
In one of the better movies of the year, Tom Hanks stars as Congressman Charlie Wilson in this sardonically funny and extremely relevant (given reasonably current events)
historical
comedy-drama surrounding the 1980s Afghan/Soviet fiasco.
In the best tradition of crusading British TV drama, 'Traffik' analyses and moralises about its ostensible subject, which is not some mythical scourge, but a matrix or process with identifiable social, economic and
historical
roots, causes and effects.
Yet while the Easter Empire is not a topic much discussed in American intellectual circles, the US did not merely mimic Golden Byzantiums public architecture, the US is much absorbed in the fated Byzantine
historical
cycle and now has faced many of the crises involving certain people of a middle eastern extraction about whom it is said that there is a slight tendency for excessive exuberance on religious matters which humbled Great Byzantium.
L.Bateman-Armchair General.There is a problem here and that is the telling of the story and the truth as to George Armstrong Custer,the story is good Hollywood entertainment perhaps even great entertainment but for whatever reasons all that could be told was changed for entertainment purposes.Though this maybe jumping the gun it might be well to know that Tom Custer was to lose his life at the "Little Big Horn" only a few feet from where George Custer was to die as well.They were brothers and Tom Custer to this very day holds a honorable distinction of being amongst a very small group perhaps only 3 others to have been awarded the Medal of Honor twice in his military career.The list of engagements that the motion picture shows indicate that Custers indeed was an active young officer.He was not with Union forces at either Chancellorsville or for that matter Fredericksburg however he was with them at the Battle of Antietam and at that point in time he was actually promoted to Captain by General McClellan but that was not to last as McClellan was soon to be replaced due to the
historical
fact that The Army of The Potomac had the means,and the information(discovered wrapped around some cigars was General Lee's plans to split his forces)and yet he failed to act for some 17 hours.It can be speculated that the war could of been over then and there had that occurred but when McClellan failed to act President Lincoln replaced him permanently and the promotion was lost as a result.
For a feature film, the plot closely follows history--or at least
historical
gossip.
great
historical
movie, will not allow a viewer to leave once you begin to watch.
The
historical
inaccuracies of this film have been well documented.
The one
historical
aspect I found most glaringly inaccurate was the final "Last Stand" which occurred on the banks of the Little Big Horn.
Many
historical
facts were thrown into the story and it was interesting to see history books come to life.
French cinema had always been very strong when comes the time to present
historical
subjects.
This film is immensely appealing ( to borrow a word from NEFER) for its
historical
information (BEER!
For anyone else interested in this subject I highly recommend the
historical
novel "A God Against The Gods" by the author of Advise and Consent.
This is an important
historical
film since it was the the first all-talking feature film.
Many of the lead characters in Hideo Gosha's 1969 film "Hitokiri" (manslayer; aka "Tenchu" -- heaven's punishment) were actual
historical
figures (in "western" name-order format): Ryoma Sakamoto, Hampeita Takechi, Shimbei Tanaka, Izo Okada, ____ Anenokoji.
The name "Hitokiri," a
historical
term, refers to a group of four super-swordsmen who carried out numerous assassinations of key figures in the ruling Tokugawa Shogunate in the mid-1800s under the orders of Takechi, the leader of the "Loyalist" (i.e.
I am not qualified to dispute "Mayerling" 's
historical
accuracy,but,in my opinion,everything else about it is risible.
There was some
historical
references to housing and furniture in parts of the world, that were much larger than would be needed for standard humans.
There is no mention in any
historical
references to buildings or artifacts that would support the idea of a 40 foot tall being.
From the fictionalising of the
historical
elements, to O'Herlihy's awful accent in later episodes, the show just slumps the further it goes.
OK, there are lots of myths about Ned Kelly, but there are also a lot of well documented facts, still leaving space for artistic creativity in producing a good
historical
dramaticisation.
In short, another Hollywierd version of an
historical
episode that deserves proper treatment.
Let me start by saying that I totally agree with the basic thesis of the film, that there probably was no
historical
Jesus and Christianity is a sham.
Back
Next
Related words
Which
Their
There
About
Political
Movie
Economic
Would
Countries
Other
History
Experience
Story
World
Should
People
Cultural
Between
While
Years