Guarantee
in sentence
1236 examples of Guarantee in a sentence
With Israel, the terms are ostensibly simpler: in exchange for a stronger US security guarantee, Israel would accept the establishment of a Palestinian state based on the 1967 borders.
History is full of examples that show that size and past success
guarantee
nothing.
And even if it does go along, there is no
guarantee
that businesses will respond as intended.
And there is no
guarantee
that Israel will accede to Hamas’s demands without disarming Gaza.
While that is true, high export prices alone were no
guarantee
for success.
While reducing the annual flow of emissions by, say, 2050 would be a positive step, it does not necessarily
guarantee
success in terms of limiting the eventual rise in global temperature.
Someone has to
guarantee
that they are adequately collateralized.
It would
guarantee
that nobody has to die at sea.
But there is no
guarantee
that such transitions will have peaceful outcomes.
And, to be sure, there is no
guarantee
that spending for Medicare and Medicaid will be cut, given that the expansion of Medicaid under Obamacare has made the program even more popular among those it serves.
There is no
guarantee
that attempts to destroy Iran’s nuclear potential and thus of its capability for a nuclear breakout will succeed.
With powers to monetize government debts similar to those exercised by the US Federal Reserve, the Bank of Japan, and the Bank of England, the ECB can now
guarantee
the eurozone against financial contagion.
What it does not do is resolve the classical free-rider problem or
guarantee
reductions in developing countries.
But, in practical terms, the agreement is hardly a
guarantee
of success.
True, democracy and the rule of law provide no foolproof security
guarantee.
But such a
guarantee
is a mirage anyway, whereas respect for basic freedoms and due process when repressing terrorism is a powerful instrument to isolate extremists and diminish their legitimacy in the eyes of those that might identify with their cause.
Intelligence services in democratic contexts usually have oversight mechanisms that serve to limit abuses of power, and to
guarantee
effective action by punishing top officials that fail to do their jobs properly.
But it is no
guarantee
against political influence on inflation.
In such cases, limited and credible intervention should suffice to flip the trend, but there is no
guarantee.
Each member country would benefit from the
guarantee
of all its partners, and only the aggregate situation of the eurozone – which is significantly better than that of the United States, Japan, or the United Kingdom – would matter.
The idea is attractive, but it must be recognized that a joint
guarantee
implies that each of the participating countries will give their partners access to their own taxpayers, who may be required to stand in for a defaulting borrower.
In concrete terms, a country may have to choose between repealing a finance bill adopted by its parliament but rejected by its eurozone partners and losing the joint
guarantee.
For example, Russia, which is helping Iran construct a nuclear reactor at Bushehr, should offer Iran a
guarantee
of low enriched uranium fuel and reprocessing of the reactor's spent fuel by sending it back to Russia if Iran agrees to forego enrichment and reprocessing.
The pot could be further sweetened by offers to relax existing sanctions and provide a security
guarantee
if Iran remains non-nuclear.
The business community, by and large, advocates the immediate
guarantee
that EU citizens currently working in the UK will be able to continue doing so.
The euro crisis had its origin in German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s decision, taken in the aftermath of Lehman Brothers’ default in September 2008, that the
guarantee
against further defaults should come not from the European Union, but from each country separately.
Even if the government-owned oil industry is broken up and privatized, whether to foreigners or not, there is no
guarantee
that a future government cannot regain control.
Europe’s Procrustean NightmareMANNHEIM – The European Union’s policy of saving the euro at all costs is enough to
guarantee
the euro’s survival.
While 25 of the EU’s 27 governments agreed to the “fiscal compact,” aimed at imposing fiscal discipline on member states, there is no
guarantee
that governments will not violate the rules, just as they violated those established by the Maastricht Treaty.
The problem is that there is no
guarantee
that German households, being voracious savers themselves, will spend the additional income.
Back
Next
Related words
Would
There
Their
Security
Which
Government
Should
Could
Countries
Political
Other
Country
Governments
Banks
Economic
Rights
Public
Order
Financial
Movie
