Growth
in sentence
19851 examples of Growth in a sentence
In 2010,
growth
reached an impressive 7.5% clip, as highly expansionary fiscal and monetary policies, implemented in response to the global financial crisis, lifted the economy out of harm’s way.
Today, similar policies are again doing the trick, with GDP
growth
picking up in the second half of 2012 and expected to reach more than 4% in 2013.
But can Brazil move beyond these stop-and-go cycles and ensure steady
growth?
Critics call it a misguided effort that will only create more distortions and retard
growth.
Raising medicine prices reduces usage, leading to more illness, lower productivity, and slower GDP
growth.
The Global
Growth
QuestNEWPORT BEACH – What is the most urgent economic priority shared by countries as diverse as Brazil, China, Cyprus, France, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Korea, Portugal, the United Kingdom, and the United States?
But the number one challenge facing these countries is to develop
growth
models that can provide more ample, well-paid, and secure jobs amid a secular re-alignment of the global economy.
The last few years have highlighted the declining potency of long-standing
growth
models.
Global
growth
averaged only 2.9% in the most recent five-year period, well below the level for virtually any such multi-year period going back to 1971.
Growth
has been virtually flat in developed economies and, at 5.6% in the emerging world, is well below the 7.6% average in the previous five-year period.
But, rather than catalyzing sensible policy discussions, these issues played into polarized and polarizing politics, creating new and more immediate headwinds to economic
growth.
Meanwhile, a highly interdependent and (now) less dynamic world economy has been limiting the scope for external
growth
drivers.
Accordingly, even countries with sound balance sheets and manageable leverage have experienced a
growth
slowdown.
With insufficient
growth
to deleverage safely, social costs have been considerable.
Given these trends, the search for more robust
growth
models will take much longer and be more complicated than many recognize – especially as the world economy pivots away from unfettered globalization and high levels of leverage.
But, without a short-term economic turbo-charger, the recovery in
growth
and jobs will remain gradual, vulnerable to political and policy risks, and disproportionately beneficial to those with favorable initial endowments of wealth and globalized talents.
Governments’ role will be different in countries like China, where officials will guide a shift from dependence on external sources of
growth
to more balanced demand.
Undermined by a lack of policy flexibility, it will take a long time for countries like Cyprus to overcome the immediate shock of crisis and revamp their
growth
models.
Left to their own devices, these multi-speed dynamics would translate into higher global
growth
overall, coupled with larger internal and cross-country disparities – often exacerbated by demographics.
No one should underestimate the
growth
challenge facing today’s global economy.
That is by far the most protracted period of weakness in real US consumer demand since the end of World War II – and a massive slowdown from the pre-crisis pace of 3.6% annual real consumption
growth
from 1996 to 2007.
With household consumption accounting for about 70% of the US economy, that 2.7-percentage-point gap between pre-crisis and post-crisis trends has been enough to knock 1.9 percentage points off the post-crisis trend in real GDP
growth.
Second, this six-quarter plunge was followed, from mid-2009 through early 2013, by 15 quarters of annualized consumption
growth
averaging just 2% – an upturn that pales in comparison with what would have been expected based on past consumer-spending cycles.
In the eight recoveries since the early 1950’s (excluding the brief pop following the credit-controls-induced slump in the 1980’s), the stock-adjustment response lifted real consumption
growth
by 6.1%, on average, for five quarters following business-cycle downturns; spurts of 7-8%
growth
were not uncommon for a quarter or two.
By contrast, the release of pent-up demand in the current cycle amounted to just 3% annualized
growth
in the five quarters from early 2010 to early 2011.
This is not only far below the rates of Asia’s economic superstars; it is also a fraction of Mexico’s own
growth
performance during the decades that preceded the debt crisis of 1982 (3.6% per year between 1960 and 1981).
What matters most is whether a country adopts the right
growth
strategy.
It is not out of line with other American yardsticks: since the output trough, real GDP has grown at an average rate of 2.86%/year, barely above the rate of
growth
of the US economy’s productive potential.
There, real GDP
growth
and declining unemployment show a solid, well-entrenched, and rapid recovery – to the point that inflation will soon become a more significant macroeconomic problem than job creation.
So, too, the renminbi’s stability has helped the region maintain strong growth, from which the world as a whole benefits.
Back
Next
Related words
Economic
Countries
Global
Economy
Which
Would
Their
Investment
Years
Economies
Productivity
Rates
World
While
Rapid
Financial
Annual
Could
Demand
Other